From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211] helo=newverein.lst.de) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YAeCM-0003EV-H0 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:34:23 +0000 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 13:33:51 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] block_dev: only write bdev inode on close Message-ID: <20150112123351.GA29325@lst.de> References: <1420739133-27514-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <1420739133-27514-5-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <20150111173209.GK25319@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150111173209.GK25319@htj.dyndns.org> Cc: David Howells , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 12:32:09PM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote: > Is this an optimization or something necessary for the following > changes? If latter, maybe it's a good idea to state why this is > necessary in the description? Otherwise, It gets rid of a bdi reassignment, and thus makes life a lot simpler. I'll update the commit message.