From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pd0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22d]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1YDGbN-0002L8-Ah for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 17:59:02 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f173.google.com with SMTP id fp1so12942427pdb.4 for ; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:58:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2015 09:58:35 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTD: Deletion of checks before the function call "iounmap" Message-ID: <20150119175835.GH9759@ld-irv-0074> References: <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <54BBE87C.9020705@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <54BBE87C.9020705@users.sourceforge.net> Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Julia Lawall , Kyungmin Park , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 06:08:12PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2015 17:30:23 +0100 > > The iounmap() function performs also input parameter validation. > Thus the test around the call is not needed. Is this guaranteed for all arch'es? I expect that it would be, but I see that, for instance, ARM allows replaceable iounmap() for subarchitectures. Also, I see checks for various sorts of static mappings in ARM and x86; these likely (always?) cover the NULL case, but they're not always straightforward. Anyway, I'm essentially saying that I'd like to be 100% sure we have a guarantee before dropping all these. > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. What script? Hand-rolled I guess? Brian