Linux-mtd Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dedekind1@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] UBI: Implement bitrot checking
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 19:01:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150412190119.7f0f7c64@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427631197-23610-5-git-send-email-richard@nod.at>

Hi Richard,

After the 'coding style related'/'useless' comments, now comes a real
question related to the approach you've taken :-).

On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 14:13:17 +0200
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:

[...]
> +
> +/**
> + * ubi_wl_trigger_bitrot_check - triggers a re-read of all physical erase
> + * blocks.
> + * @ubi: UBI device description object
> + */
> +void ubi_wl_trigger_bitrot_check(struct ubi_device *ubi)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct ubi_wl_entry *e;
> +
> +	ubi_msg(ubi, "Running a full read check");
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < ubi->peb_count; i++) {
> +		spin_lock(&ubi->wl_lock);
> +		e = ubi->lookuptbl[i];
> +		spin_unlock(&ubi->wl_lock);
> +		if (e) {
> +			atomic_inc(&ubi->bit_rot_work);
> +			schedule_bitrot_check(ubi, e);
> +		}
> +	}

Do we really need to create a ubi_work per PEB ?
Couldn't we create a single work being rescheduled inside the worker
function (after updating the ubi_wl_entry of course).

I'm pretty sure I'm missing something obvious that you'll probably
point out ;-).


-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-04-12 17:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-29 12:13 UBI: Bitrot checking Richard Weinberger
2015-03-29 12:13 ` [PATCH 1/4] UBI: Introduce ubi_schedule_fm_work() Richard Weinberger
2015-03-29 12:13 ` [PATCH 2/4] UBI: Introduce prepare_erase_work() Richard Weinberger
2015-03-29 12:13 ` [PATCH 3/4] UBI: Introduce in_pq() Richard Weinberger
2015-03-29 12:13 ` [PATCH 4/4] UBI: Implement bitrot checking Richard Weinberger
2015-04-02 17:34   ` Andrea Scian
2015-04-02 17:54     ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-02 19:19       ` Andrea Scian
2015-04-08 10:34         ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-08 21:02           ` Andrea Scian
2015-04-08 11:48   ` David Oberhollenzer
2015-04-12 14:12   ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 16:09     ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 16:43       ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 16:55         ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 20:42           ` [PATCH 4/4] UBI: Implement bitrot checking (linux-mtd Digest, Vol 145, Issue 24) Andrea Scian
2015-04-12 21:01             ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 21:30               ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 21:37                 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 21:33               ` Andrea Scian
2015-04-12 21:42                 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-13 17:17                   ` linux-mtd digest emails (was Re: [PATCH 4/4] UBI: Implement bitrot checking) Brian Norris
2015-04-12 15:14   ` [PATCH 4/4] UBI: Implement bitrot checking Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 16:14     ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 16:31       ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 16:32         ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 17:01   ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2015-04-12 17:09     ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 19:20       ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 19:53         ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-12 21:24           ` Boris Brezillon
2015-04-12 21:34             ` Richard Weinberger
2015-04-13  3:36               ` nick
2015-04-12 17:36     ` Richard Weinberger
     [not found] <mailman.38750.1427638218.22890.linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
     [not found] <mailman.40253.1428858576.22890.linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150412190119.7f0f7c64@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox