From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 10:55:49 +0300 From: Baruch Siach To: Fabio Estevam Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mtd: mxc_nand: limit the size of used oob Message-ID: <20150503075549.GH2265@tarshish> References: <20150426200725.GC19431@pengutronix.de> <20150427043906.GR2258@tarshish> <20150427071238.GE19431@pengutronix.de> <20150427072057.GT2258@tarshish> <20150427075023.GF19431@pengutronix.de> <20150427114341.GW2258@tarshish> <20150427193127.GU19431@pengutronix.de> <20150429061853.GB2258@tarshish> <20150429063508.GE19431@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Cc: Fabio Estevam , Brian Norris , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Sascha Hauer , Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= , Shawn Guo , David Woodhouse , Sascha Hauer List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Fabio, On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 12:20:32PM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote: > On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:35 AM, Uwe Kleine-König > wrote: > > > That's surprising. It would be interesting to hear from Freescale what > > is wrong here (Fabio? Maybe contact support?). I quickly skimmed through > > the errata documents but didn't found anything. So it's not only that > > Yes, that's something I am not aware of either. > > Please contact the FSL support folks so that the hardware guys could > assist on this topic. Our past experience with hardware support at the micro level was not all that great. Anyway, I dropped the limit to 128 for oobsize < 218, since this is only a theoretic bug, and I can't really test it. Thanks, baruch -- http://baruch.siach.name/blog/ ~. .~ Tk Open Systems =}------------------------------------------------ooO--U--Ooo------------{= - baruch@tkos.co.il - tel: +972.2.679.5364, http://www.tkos.co.il -