From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6 linux-next] ubifs: remove unnecessary else after break
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 14:45:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150519214558.GZ11598@ld-irv-0074> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431726240-4675-5-git-send-email-fabf@skynet.be>
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 11:43:59PM +0200, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> else is not needed after break in dbg_check_old_index()
> This also solves the {} parity.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
> ---
> fs/ubifs/commit.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/commit.c b/fs/ubifs/commit.c
> index 63f5661..dd9ba81 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/commit.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/commit.c
> @@ -680,9 +680,9 @@ int dbg_check_old_index(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_zbranch *zroot)
> if (iip + 1 < le16_to_cpu(idx->child_cnt)) {
> iip = iip + 1;
> break;
> - } else
> - /* Nope, so go up again */
> - iip = i->iip;
> + }
> + /* Nope, so go up again */
> + iip = i->iip;
> }
> } else
> /* Go down left */
I think the 'else' structure makes things clearer, so I'd personally
just fix the braces. But of course coding style is more opinion than
science.
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-19 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-15 21:43 [PATCH 1/6 linux-next] ubifs: remove unnecessary semi-colon Fabian Frederick
2015-05-15 21:43 ` [PATCH 2/6 linux-next] ubifs: simplify return in shrink_liability() Fabian Frederick
2015-05-15 21:43 ` [PATCH 3/6 linux-next] ubifs: simplify return in layout_cnodes() Fabian Frederick
2015-05-15 21:43 ` [PATCH 4/6 linux-next] ubifs: simplify return in sort_nodes() Fabian Frederick
2015-05-15 21:43 ` [PATCH 5/6 linux-next] ubifs: remove unnecessary else after break Fabian Frederick
2015-05-19 21:45 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2015-05-15 21:44 ` [PATCH 6/6 linux-next] ubifs: remove else after return Fabian Frederick
2015-05-18 22:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-05-19 17:42 ` Fabian Frederick
2015-05-19 17:57 ` Richard Weinberger
2015-05-22 21:37 ` Fabian Frederick
2015-05-22 21:46 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150519214558.GZ11598@ld-irv-0074 \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=fabf@skynet.be \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox