Re: [PATCH 1/1] [RESEND] IFC: Change IO accessor based on endianness

[Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>]

On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 08:55:51AM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-05-12 at 03:49 -0500, Bharat Bhushan wrote:
> > From: Jaiprakash Singh <b44839@freescale.com>
> > 
> > IFC IO accressor are set at run time based
> > on IFC IP registers endianness.IFC node in
> > DTS file contains information about
> > endianness.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jaiprakash Singh <b44839@freescale.com>
> > ---
> >  Tested on T1040RDB, LS2085a, LS1
> > 
> >  .../bindings/memory-controllers/fsl/ifc.txt        |    3 +
> >  drivers/memory/fsl_ifc.c                           |   43 +++-
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/fsl_ifc_nand.c                    |  258 ++++++++++----------
> >  include/linux/fsl_ifc.h                            |   50 ++++
> >  4 files changed, 213 insertions(+), 141 deletions(-)
> 
> As before,
> Acked-by: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
> 
> This touches MTD as well as dependencies outside MTD -- which tree
> should it go through?

I haven't actually seen the patch on linux-mtd. Were we CC'd? If not,
please resend, and CC linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org. (Try
scripts/get_maintainer.pl to find the right people/lists.)

And is this the previous version?

http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2014-November/056249.html

I don't mind either tree. I don't think fsl_ifc_nand.c will have
anything noisy in linux-mtd for this release cycle.

Brian