From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Yv7iR-0006N1-6o for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 May 2015 17:23:35 +0000 Received: by pdbnk13 with SMTP id nk13so76103941pdb.1 for ; Wed, 20 May 2015 10:23:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 20 May 2015 10:23:09 -0700 From: Brian Norris To: Haikun Wang Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v1] mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: Enable LS1021 support Message-ID: <20150520172309.GE11598@ld-irv-0074> References: <1429871214-44560-1-git-send-email-haikun.wang@freescale.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1429871214-44560-1-git-send-email-haikun.wang@freescale.com> Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, han.xu@freescale.com List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 06:26:54PM +0800, Haikun Wang wrote: > Add LS1021 QSPI chip special information > > Signed-off-by: Haikun Wang > --- > drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c | 8 ++++++++ > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c > index 5d5d362..1742de9 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/fsl-quadspi.c > @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ > enum fsl_qspi_devtype { > FSL_QUADSPI_VYBRID, > FSL_QUADSPI_IMX6SX, > + FSL_QUADSPI_LS1, > }; > > struct fsl_qspi_devtype_data { > @@ -217,6 +218,12 @@ static struct fsl_qspi_devtype_data imx6sx_data = { > .ahb_buf_size = 1024 > }; > > +static struct fsl_qspi_devtype_data ls1_data = { > + .devtype = FSL_QUADSPI_LS1, > + .rxfifo = 128, > + .txfifo = 64; Do you compile test your changes? This definition does not use valid C syntax. This shows that not only did you not test your code, you didn't even compile it. I can't take your code when you make your lack of diligence that obvious. Same thing for your second patch. Brian > +}; > + > #define FSL_QSPI_MAX_CHIP 4 > struct fsl_qspi { > struct mtd_info mtd[FSL_QSPI_MAX_CHIP]; > @@ -665,6 +672,7 @@ static int fsl_qspi_nor_setup_last(struct fsl_qspi *q) > static struct of_device_id fsl_qspi_dt_ids[] = { > { .compatible = "fsl,vf610-qspi", .data = (void *)&vybrid_data, }, > { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-qspi", .data = (void *)&imx6sx_data, }, > + { .compatible = "fsl,ls1-qspi", .data = (void *)&ls1_data, }, > { /* sentinel */ } > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, fsl_qspi_dt_ids);