From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Z4ZrV-000540-HP for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 Jun 2015 19:16:02 +0000 Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 21:14:29 +0200 From: Oleg Nesterov To: Petr Mladek Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/18] signal/kthread: Initial implementation of kthread signal handling Message-ID: <20150615191429.GA29727@redhat.com> References: <1433516477-5153-1-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz> <1433516477-5153-7-git-send-email-pmladek@suse.cz> <20150606215816.GB15591@redhat.com> <20150608135107.GB3135@pathway.suse.cz> <20150608211336.GB24869@redhat.com> <20150615131341.GN9409@pathway.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150615131341.GN9409@pathway.suse.cz> Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Thomas Gleixner , Jiri Kosina , Peter Zijlstra , Richard Weinberger , Trond Myklebust , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt , Michal Hocko , Chris Mason , Ingo Molnar , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , Tejun Heo , live-patching@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , "Paul E. McKenney" , David Woodhouse , Anna Schumaker List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Petr, On 06/15, Petr Mladek wrote: > > I am sorry for the late reply. I wanted to think more before answering > all the mails. Don't worry I am always late ;) > On Mon 2015-06-08 23:13:36, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > > > Hmm, the helper would have a strange semantic. You need to take > > > sighand->siglock, dequeue the signal (SIGSTOP), and call > > > __set_current_state(TASK_STOPPED) before you release the lock. > > > But what would happen if the dequeued signal is _not_ SIGSTOP? > > > > Perhaps I missed your point, but no. If you want to handle SIGSTOP > > you can do > > > > I think that we need to add: > > spin_lock_irq(&sighand->siglock); > > > signr = kthread_signal_dequeue(); > > switch (signr) { > > case SIGSTOP: > > something_else(); > > kthread_do_signal_stop(); > > ... > > } > > And if we want to avoid any race, kthread_do_signal_stop() should look like: > > void kthread_do_signal_stop(unsigned long flags) > { > struct sighand_struct *sighand = current->sighand; > > __set_current_state(TASK_STOPPED); > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sighand->siglock, flags); > /* Don't run again until woken by SIGCONT or SIGKILL */ > freezable_schedule(); > } Ah, understand. You think that we need to take ->siglock in advance to avoid the race with SIGCONT? No, we don't. Let me show you the code I suggested again: void kthread_do_signal_stop(void) { spin_lock_irq(&curtent->sighand->siglock); if (current->jobctl & JOBCTL_STOP_DEQUEUED) __set_current_state(TASK_STOPPED); spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); schedule(); } so you can dequeue_signal() and call kthread_do_signal_stop() without holding ->siglock. We can rely on JOBCTL_STOP_DEQUEUED bit. SIGCONT clears it, so kthread_do_signal_stop() can't race. Oleg.