Re: [RFT PATCH 1/4] mtd: fsl-quadspi: use automatic spi-nor detection

[Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>]

On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 04:09:27PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:15:50PM -0500, Han Xu wrote:
> > Seems Huang has changed the e-mail address.

Thanks, noted.

> > On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 9:56 PM, Brian Norris
> > <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 07:40:27AM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> > >> On 14 August 2015 at 01:24, Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > Now, each flash connected to the controller has its own device_node. All
> > >> > this patch is saying is that we don't need to know much about that node;
> > >> > as long as it responds to the READ ID command properly, spi_nor_scan()
> > >> > can autodetect it.
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >> And if there was suppor for a flash chip that does not respond to READ
> > >> ID (or uses a different opcode for it) this patch would break it,
> > >> right?
> 
> Do not worry about the quadspi controller :)
> 
> The controller only uses the best NOR flash (or maybe the best NOR flash), I remember
> that the NOR flash can support the QUAD DDR read which is not supported not.
> 
> So it will not break the driver. 
> 
> Btw: @Han Xu : I think you can test this patch.
> 
> > >
> > > For the latter: this already doesn't support chips that use different
> > > opcodes.
> > >
> > > For the former: we're only talking about the "*-nonjedec" and similar,
> > > right? I'm not confident those were supported well by this driver in the
> > > first place. (And "*-nonjedec" should really die; if it's needed,
> > > support should be added by design, not by accident.)
> > >
> > > Perhaps Huang can comment.
> 
> I think this patch is okay. But please wait for Han's test result.

OK. Pushed patches 2-4 to l2-mtd.git/next. Will wait on this one.