From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238] helo=mail.free-electrons.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZfNSw-0000ei-7U for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 25 Sep 2015 07:30:46 +0000 Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2015 09:30:23 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: "Bean Huo =?UTF-8?B?6ZyN5paM5paM?= (beanhuo)" Cc: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "computersforpeace@gmail.com" , Stefan Roese , Iwo Mergler , "Jeff Lauruhn (jlauruhn)" , "dedekind1@gmail.com" , "richard@nod.at" , "shuangshuo@gmail.com" , "rnd4@dave-tech.it" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" Subject: Re: UBI/UBIFS: dealing with MLC's paired pages Message-ID: <20150925093023.113ceeb1@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 00:43:37 +0000 Bean Huo =E9=9C=8D=E6=96=8C=E6=96=8C (beanhuo) wrote: > > And 3: > > Only NAND provides an OOB area. Other flash devices like parallel > > or SPI NOR don't. And we definitely want to continue supporting > > platforms with such flash devices and UBI (and UBIFS). > >=20 > > Thanks, > > Stefan > >=20 > For MLC NAND paired pages issue, we have developed two methods to solve i= t in UBI layer, > We hope that every expert on UBI/UBIFS can give more suggestions about ho= w to improve and perfect it. > I think ,this week, I can submit first solution patch out. Currently do c= oding style. Are you referring to the suggestion proposed by Karl (using the OOB area to store UBI metadata), or is this something else? Best Regards, Boris --=20 Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com