From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] mtd: ofpart: update devicetree binding specification
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2015 13:04:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151011200402.GE3696@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e47db0c8eeaeb11353bcb2f4dcd138e813c3ecd7.1439911625.git.hramrach@gmail.com>
Hi DT maintainers,
It's a bit hypocritical of me, since I've been a slow reviewer as well,
but... can we get some review on this one? Usually, I'm comfortable
taking driver DT bindings without your review, but this one is a bit
more generic and is more far-reaching than the average driver.
I'm not a big fan of this change, and I don't quite understand why the
bus driver (the SPI bus, which is a level up from the SPI device / MTD
node) can specify its grandchildren (see spi-samsung.txt). But given the
constraints, I think Michal's solution is OK. And I do agree that MTD's
ofpart should be bit more specific.
Anyway, a quick look and an Ack/Nak would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Brian
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 03:34:08PM -0000, Michal Suchanek wrote:
> To avoid conflict with other drivers using subnodes of the mtd device
> create only one ofpart-specific node rather than any number of
> arbitrary partition subnodes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
> ---
> v3:
>
> - rename DT node ofpart -> partitions
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt | 68 +++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt
> index 8e5557d..8c2aff7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt
> @@ -4,10 +4,16 @@ Partitions can be represented by sub-nodes of an mtd device. This can be used
> on platforms which have strong conventions about which portions of a flash are
> used for what purposes, but which don't use an on-flash partition table such
> as RedBoot.
> +
> +The partition table should be partitions subnode of the mtd node. Partitions are
> +defined in subnodes of the partitions node.
> +
> +For backwards compatibility partitions as direct subnodes of the mtd device are
> +supported. This use is discouraged.
> NOTE: if the sub-node has a compatible string, then it is not a partition.
>
> -#address-cells & #size-cells must both be present in the mtd device. There are
> -two valid values for both:
> +#address-cells & #size-cells must both be present in the partitions subnode of the
> +mtd device. There are two valid values for both:
> <1>: for partitions that require a single 32-bit cell to represent their
> size/address (aka the value is below 4 GiB)
> <2>: for partitions that require two 32-bit cells to represent their
> @@ -28,44 +34,50 @@ Examples:
>
>
> flash@0 {
> - #address-cells = <1>;
> - #size-cells = <1>;
> + partitions {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
>
> - partition@0 {
> - label = "u-boot";
> - reg = <0x0000000 0x100000>;
> - read-only;
> - };
> + partition@0 {
> + label = "u-boot";
> + reg = <0x0000000 0x100000>;
> + read-only;
> + };
>
> - uimage@100000 {
> - reg = <0x0100000 0x200000>;
> + uimage@100000 {
> + reg = <0x0100000 0x200000>;
> + };
> };
> };
>
> flash@1 {
> - #address-cells = <1>;
> - #size-cells = <2>;
> + partitions {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
>
> - /* a 4 GiB partition */
> - partition@0 {
> - label = "filesystem";
> - reg = <0x00000000 0x1 0x00000000>;
> + /* a 4 GiB partition */
> + partition@0 {
> + label = "filesystem";
> + reg = <0x00000000 0x1 0x00000000>;
> + };
> };
> };
>
> flash@2 {
> - #address-cells = <2>;
> - #size-cells = <2>;
> + partitions {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
>
> - /* an 8 GiB partition */
> - partition@0 {
> - label = "filesystem #1";
> - reg = <0x0 0x00000000 0x2 0x00000000>;
> - };
> + /* an 8 GiB partition */
> + partition@0 {
> + label = "filesystem #1";
> + reg = <0x0 0x00000000 0x2 0x00000000>;
> + };
>
> - /* a 4 GiB partition */
> - partition@200000000 {
> - label = "filesystem #2";
> - reg = <0x2 0x00000000 0x1 0x00000000>;
> + /* a 4 GiB partition */
> + partition@200000000 {
> + label = "filesystem #2";
> + reg = <0x2 0x00000000 0x1 0x00000000>;
> + };
> };
> };
> --
> 2.1.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-11 20:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-18 15:34 [PATCH v3 0/5] improve mtdpart robustness Michal Suchanek
2015-08-18 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] mtd: mtdpart: Do not fail mtd probe when parsing partitions fails Michal Suchanek
2015-10-11 20:03 ` Brian Norris
2015-10-27 1:44 ` Brian Norris
2015-08-18 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] mtd: mtdpart: add debug prints to partition parser Michal Suchanek
2015-10-11 20:00 ` Brian Norris
2015-08-18 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] mtd: ofpart: update devicetree binding specification Michal Suchanek
2015-10-11 20:04 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2015-10-27 2:01 ` Brian Norris
2015-10-27 4:35 ` Rob Herring
2015-10-27 22:50 ` Brian Norris
2015-10-28 0:45 ` Rob Herring
2015-08-18 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] mtd: ofpart: document the lock flag Michal Suchanek
2015-10-11 20:04 ` Brian Norris
2015-10-27 1:47 ` Brian Norris
2015-08-18 15:34 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] mtd: ofpart: move ofpart partitions to a dedicated dt node Michal Suchanek
2015-10-31 0:21 ` Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151011200402.GE3696@localhost \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=hramrach@gmail.com \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox