From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZrD4R-0005cd-9l for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 22:50:23 +0000 Received: by pacfv9 with SMTP id fv9so245839889pac.3 for ; Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:50:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2015 15:50:00 -0700 From: Brian Norris To: Rob Herring Cc: Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , David Woodhouse , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , Boris Brezillon , Michal Suchanek Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/5] mtd: ofpart: update devicetree binding specification Message-ID: <20151027225000.GA64073@google.com> References: <20151011200402.GE3696@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Rob, Thanks for the review. On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 11:35:24PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Sun, Oct 11, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Brian Norris > wrote: > > Hi DT maintainers, > > > > It's a bit hypocritical of me, since I've been a slow reviewer as well, > > but... can we get some review on this one? Usually, I'm comfortable > > taking driver DT bindings without your review, but this one is a bit > > more generic and is more far-reaching than the average driver. > > Sorry, missed this one. This would be a good one to send to > devicetree-spec to BTW. I'm not very familiar with that list. With the intention of getting into an ePAPR (or similar) spec? Or just for additional review? If the former, would you suggest codifying both the old and the new, or just the new? Brian