linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>, Frans Klaver <fransklaver@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-4.4] mtd: nand: assign reasonable default name for NAND drivers
Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:25:38 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160105182538.GH109450@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160104213102.4e3757d3@bbrezillon>

Hi Boris,

On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 09:31:02PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Mon,  4 Jan 2016 11:11:03 -0800
> Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Commits such as commit 853f1c58c4b2 ("mtd: nand: omap2: show parent
> > device structure in sysfs") attempt to rely on the core MTD code to set
> > the MTD name based on the parent device. However, nand_base tries to set
> > a different default name according to the flash name (e.g., extracted
> > from the ONFI parameter page), which means NAND drivers will never make
> > use of the MTD defaults. This is not the intention of commit
> > 853f1c58c4b2.
> > 
> > This results in problems when trying to use the cmdline partition
> > parser, since the MTD name is different than expected. Let's fix this by
> > providing a default NAND name, where possible.
> > 
> > Note that this is not really a great default name in the long run, since
> > this means that if there are multiple MTDs attached to the same
> > controller device, they will have the same name. But that is an existing
> > issue and requires future work on a better controller vs. flash chip
> > abstraction to fix properly.
> 
> Yep, and IMHO, the chip numbering currently in use in most NAND
> controller drivers is not the best solution either. We should somehow
> find a way to describe the mtd id using something like:
> 
> mtd-id: <nand-controller-id>@<cs-line>
> nand-controller-id: <nand-controller-ip-name>-<ip-address>

Maybe dots ('.') instead of '@'? But otherwise, seems somewhat
reasonable. Maybe this could just be something like:

	dev_name(mtd->dev.parent) + "." + chip_select

> Anyway, let's discuss that after the nand-chip <-> nand-controller
> separation rework.

Sure.

> > Reported-by: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs@denx.de>
> > Cc: Frans Klaver <fransklaver@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > This patch is needed in additon to commit 472b444eef93 ("mtd: fix cmdlinepart
> > parser, early naming for auto-filled MTD") to fix Heiko's reported problem. At
> > this point, I'm not sure if this should be targeted toward late 4.4 or for 4.5.
> > It's a 4.4 regresssion, but a very small one. And I'm not sure if this will
> > have wide enough impact that it should be given a longer time to be reviewed
> > and tested. We can always send it to -stable later, if it's really needed.
> > 
> >  drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> > index ece544efccc3..9f169566fba4 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> > @@ -3826,6 +3826,9 @@ static struct nand_flash_dev *nand_get_flash_type(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> >  	if (!type)
> >  		type = nand_flash_ids;
> >  
> > +	if (!mtd->name && mtd->dev.parent)
> > +		mtd->name = dev_name(mtd->dev.parent);
> > +
> 
> Just nitpicking, but I think this would be better placed in
> nand_set_defaults() or in nand_scan_ident() before nand_get_flash_type()
> call.

Hmm, nand_set_defaults() would probably be better. I'll resend this and
defer it to 4.5 (and 4.4.x).

> Anyway,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>

Thanks,
Brian

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-05 18:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-04 19:11 [PATCH for-4.4] mtd: nand: assign reasonable default name for NAND drivers Brian Norris
2016-01-04 20:31 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-01-05 18:25   ` Brian Norris [this message]
2016-01-05  6:11 ` Heiko Schocher
2016-01-05 15:28 ` [for-4.4] " Sørensen, Stefan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160105182538.GH109450@google.com \
    --to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=fransklaver@gmail.com \
    --cc=hs@denx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).