From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aGxSk-0007CA-R2 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 23:25:55 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-x229.google.com with SMTP id yy13so150002254pab.3 for ; Wed, 06 Jan 2016 15:25:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 15:25:31 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: Sergei Ianovich Cc: Rob Herring , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , David Woodhouse , Jeremy Kerr , Cyril Bur , Neelesh Gupta , Michael Ellerman , Joel Stanley , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , "open list:MEMORY TECHNOLOGY DEVICES (MTD)" , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] mtd: support BB SRAM on ICP DAS LP-8x4x Message-ID: <20160106232531.GP109450@google.com> References: <1397668667-27328-4-git-send-email-ynvich@gmail.com> <1450205941-15593-1-git-send-email-ynvich@gmail.com> <20151220033807.GC9883@rob-hp-laptop> <1450608238.15911.24.camel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1450608238.15911.24.camel@gmail.com> List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 01:43:58PM +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: > On Sat, 2015-12-19 at 21:38 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 09:58:53PM +0300, Sergei Ianovich wrote: > > > +Required properties: > > > +- compatible : should be "icpdas,sram-lp8x4x" > > > > No wildcards please. Otherwise looks fine. > > There is a similar review comment from Arnd Bergmann in the discussion > of `[PATCH v5] serial: support for 16550A serial ports on LP-8x4x`. > > I'll quote my latest clarification: > > ... This driver will support ports on LP-8081,  ^^ So 8081 doesn't even match the wildcard scheme you give in the compatible string, proving the point of the Conventional Wisdom suggestion Rob gave... > > LP-8141, LP-8441, LP-8841. Last time I checked the vendor was announcing > > a series with 3 as the last digit. They use lp8x4x name, eg. in > > documentation like `LP-8x4x_ChangeLog.txt`. They ship their proprietary > > SDK in `lp8x4x_sdk_for_linux.tar`. All of this implies that it is a > > single board. > > I think the solution should be the same for all LP-8x4x drivers (IRQ, > SRAM, SERIAL, IIO). The rationale is described here: http://devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage#Understanding_the_compatible_Property Quote: > Warning: Don't use wildcard compatible values, like "fsl,mpc83xx-uart" > or similar. Silicon vendors will invariably make a change that breaks > your wildcard assumptions the moment it is too late to change it. > Instead, choose a specific silicon implementations and make all > subsequent silicon compatible with it. I don't think your circumstance is anything unique. Regards, Brian