From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Cc: Michael Wang <Michael.Wang@alliedtelesis.co.nz>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar" <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Subject: Re: mtd: pxa3xx_nand: issue with command time out
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:30:22 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160125183022.GA41251@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <874meddqu5.fsf@belgarion.home>
Hi Robert,
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 12:53:06AM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Michael Wang <Michael.Wang@alliedtelesis.co.nz> writes:
>
> > The complete output of debug traces and boot log from your debug patch
> > is in the attachment.
>
> Okay, thanks, that's great.
> Might a ask another capture, but with :
> 1) the timestamps this time
> (ie. CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME=y) ? This will give me the timing of your failure,
> in the dmesg you will provide me.
> 2) on the first line of drain_fifo(), add a single :
> nand_readl(info, NDSR)
>
> This will enable me to see how your board behaves on the temporal aspect, as
> today I only have this, which looks correct AFAICT:
>
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_start():445 nand_writel(0x1, NDECCCTRL)
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_start():465 nand_writel(0xfff, NDSR)
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_start():466 nand_writel(0x0, NDCR)
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_start():467 nand_writel(0xd104b000, NDCR)
>
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_irq():656 nand_readl(NDSR): 0x1
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_irq():706 nand_writel(0x1, NDSR)
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_irq():720 nand_writel(0x100d3000, NDCB0)
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_irq():721 nand_writel(0x4ff0000, NDCB0)
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_irq():722 nand_writel(0x2, NDCB0)
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_irq():726 nand_writel(0x820, NDCB0)
> => RJK: here the read command is submitted
>
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_irq():656 nand_readl(NDSR): 0x1800
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_irq():706 nand_writel(0x1800, NDSR)
> => RJK: here the read command is completed
>
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_irq():656 nand_readl(NDSR): 0x2
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: Wait time out!!!
> => RJK: here data is available in NAND controller, and yet it's too late
>
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_stop():476 nand_readl(0x0000): 0xd104b000
> pxa3xx-nand f10d0000.nand: pxa3xx_nand_irq_thread():636 nand_writel(0x6, 0x0014)
> => RJK: here we finish the read data transfer operation, too late
I'm not extremely familiar with this driver, but you've caused me to
take a second look at this commit:
commit 24542257a3b987025d4b998ec2d15e556c98ad3f
Author: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Date: Fri Feb 20 19:36:43 2015 +0100
mtd: pxa3xx-nand: handle PIO in threaded interrupt
And now I'm wondering: when does the completion get triggered? i.e.:
complete(&info->cmd_complete);
?
It seems to me like you've short-circuited some of the IRQ handling
code, so that the threaded handler is buggy. AIUI, if the completion
event ever happens, it's actually happening *before* the full (threaded)
handler is actually finished, since it occurs in pxa3xx_nand_irq(),
before pxa3xx_nand_irq_thread() ever runs. Now, I'm not sure if that
causes a real problem in practice, since you used IRQF_ONESHOT, but I
would think that's also suspect.
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-25 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-13 4:13 mtd: pxa3xx_nand: issue with command time out Michael Wang
2016-01-13 7:47 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-01-14 22:57 ` Michael Wang
2016-01-16 23:53 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-01-18 2:15 ` Michael Wang
2016-01-18 21:13 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-01-19 22:33 ` Michael Wang
2016-01-25 18:30 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2016-01-25 20:48 ` Robert Jarzmik
2016-01-26 13:03 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2016-03-01 22:17 ` Hamish Martin
2016-03-03 19:24 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2016-03-03 20:16 ` Hamish Martin
2016-03-04 0:03 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2016-03-07 20:04 ` Hamish Martin
2016-03-03 23:18 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160125183022.GA41251@google.com \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=Michael.Wang@alliedtelesis.co.nz \
--cc=ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).