From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pa0-x242.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::242]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1aUIr5-0006lI-QD for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 18:54:23 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-x242.google.com with SMTP id fl4so4129145pad.2 for ; Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:53:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 10:53:47 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: Simon Arlott , Ralf Baechle Cc: David Woodhouse , Kevin Cernekee , Florian Fainelli , Jonas Gorski , Linux Kernel Mailing List , MIPS Mailing List , MTD Maling List , sfr@canb.auug.org.au Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next v4 07/11] MIPS: bcm63xx: nvram: Remove unused bcm63xx_nvram_get_psi_size() function Message-ID: <20160212185347.GA21465@google.com> References: <566DF43B.5010400@simon.arlott.org.uk> <566DF625.3060801@simon.arlott.org.uk> <20160126191607.GA111152@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160126191607.GA111152@google.com> List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Ralf, On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:16:07AM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 10:50:13PM +0000, Simon Arlott wrote: > > Remove bcm63xx_nvram_get_psi_size() as it now has no users. > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Arlott > > --- > > v4: New patch. > > Ralf, > > Please revert this and send it to Linus (or else, I can send it myself). > This is causing build failures, because I didn't take the rest of > Simon's series yet. > > drivers/mtd/bcm63xxpart.c: In function 'bcm63xx_parse_cfe_partitions': > drivers/mtd/bcm63xxpart.c:93:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'bcm63xx_nvram_get_psi_size' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] > > I will reply to the series if/when I accept any patches from it. I would > appreciate it if you would do the same. I see that the revert made it to Linus. Thanks! I've now pushed the dependent pieces to l2-mtd.git, and they should make it to v4.6-rc1. So I guess it's fair game to re-apply this patch? Although, if you don't merge in my MTD branch first, you'd still be breaking bisectability... Maybe it's a post-rc1 candidate? Brian