From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pa0-x242.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::242]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ad0MP-0008UW-Ee for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 18:58:32 +0000 Received: by mail-pa0-x242.google.com with SMTP id hj7so8199116pac.1 for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 10:58:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:58:05 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: Roger Quadros Cc: tony@atomide.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar, javier@dowhile0.org, fcooper@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Boris Brezillon Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/26] mtd: nand: omap: Update DT binding documentation Message-ID: <20160307185805.GV55664@google.com> References: <1455916548-3441-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1455916548-3441-11-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <20160305020430.GL55664@google.com> <56DD4DF0.4020500@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56DD4DF0.4020500@ti.com> List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 11:46:24AM +0200, Roger Quadros wrote: > On 05/03/16 04:04, Brian Norris wrote: > > Is it normal to mix types of addressing in a single 'reg' property? Is > > your code working for anything besides CS==0? > > Yes we're using non zero CS on different omap platforms. > I haven't changed the behaviour of the reg property in this series. Just updated the documentation. > > I didn't understand what you meant by mixing type of addressing. > > This usage is exactly as mentioned here > http://devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage#Ranges_.28Address_Translation.29 I think I was just misunderstanding the use of the reg, *-cells, and ranges properties here. Thanks for the pointer. Brian