From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1adMEp-00075y-V3 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 18:20:08 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 63so18324512pfe.3 for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2016 10:19:46 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 10:19:44 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz , dwmw2@infradead.org, matthias.bgg@gmail.com, robh@kernel.org, daniel.thompson@linaro.org, xiaolei.li@mediatek.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mtd: mediatek: device tree docs for MTK Smart Device Gen1 NAND Message-ID: <20160308181944.GK55664@google.com> References: <1456938013-8819-1-git-send-email-jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org> <1456938013-8819-2-git-send-email-jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org> <20160308160038.29374f04@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160308160038.29374f04@bbrezillon> List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Boris, On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 04:00:38PM +0100, Boris Brezillon wrote: > We're trying to enforce the NAND controller and NAND chip separation > for all new NAND controller drivers, and representing those 2 elements > in the DT is now the preferred approach. > > You can have a look at the sunxi-nand bindings [1]. > > Thanks, > > Boris > > [1]http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/sunxi-nand.txt This suggestion is coming up a lot. Can you please document some general best practices for this in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt? Thanks, Brian