From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Peter Pan <peterpansjtu@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
karlzhang@micron.com, beanhuo@micron.com,
xuejiancheng@huawei.com, Peter Pan <peterpandong@micron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:57:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160316135700.5e9593c7@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAyFOR+=xRiL+uJXmsLxGuhayn15-gP1HGZ24SEMqQjTqZdAKA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Peter,
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 10:57:49 +0800
Peter Pan <peterpansjtu@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry I forgot to add subject prefix. Should I re-send it ?
No that should be fine. Thanks for reworking this series as suggested.
I'll try to review it soon.
>
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:47 AM, Peter Pan <peterpansjtu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sorry for send the v3 out late. I went through a busy time in the past
> > two month.
> >
> > Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other
> > NAND family chips hard to use nand_bbt.c. Maybe it's the reason why
> > onenand has own bbt(onenand_bbt.c).
> >
> > Separate struct nand_chip from BBT code can make current BBT shareable.
> > We create struct nand_bbt to take place of nand_chip in nand_bbt.c.
> > Struct nand_bbt contains all the information BBT needed from outside and
> > it should be embedded into NAND family chip struct (such as struct nand_chip).
> >
> > Below is mtd folder structure we want:
> > drivers/mtd/nand/<all-nand-core-code>
> > drivers/mtd/nand/raw/<raw-nand-controller-drivers>
> > drivers/mtd/nand/spi/<spi-nand-code>
> > drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/<onenand-code>
> > drivers/mtd/nand/chips/<manufacturer-spcific-code>
> >
> > Most of the patch is borrowed from Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>.
> > http://git.infradead.org/users/norris/linux-mtd.git/shortlog/refs/heads/nand-bbt
> > I decided the authorship of each patch by contribution. Please let me know if
> > there is something unproper.
> > Based on Brian's suggestion and Boris's comments, I make 11 independent
> > patches. Previous patch is http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/492066/
> > After discussion with Boris and Ezequiel, I realized above structure is better,
> > so I drop the patch to move nand_bbt.c to mtd folder.
> >
> > The patch is tested on Zed board.
> >
> > v3 changes:
> > introduce struct nand_bbt_ops
> > introduce struct nand_chip_layout_info
> > add nand_bbt_create/destroy() API
> > use mtd_to_nand instead mtd->priv directly
> > remove mark_bad_bbm() due to no user yet
> > keep nand_bbt.c in mtd/nand folder
> > add nand_get_bbt() helper function
> > rebase patch series on 4.5.0-rc1
> > v2 changes:
> > rebase patch series on master branch of l2-mtd.git
> >
> >
> > Brian Norris (7):
> > mtd: nand_bbt: new header for nand family BBT
> > mtd: nand_bbt: introduce BBT related data structure
> > mtd: nand_bbt: use struct nand_bbt_ops in BBT
> > mtd: nand: make nand_erase_nand() static
> > mtd: nand_bbt: remove struct nand_chip from nand_bbt.c
> > mtd: nand_bbt: remove NAND_BBT_DYNAMICSTRUCT macro
> > mtd: nand: remove nand_chip.bbt
> >
> > Peter Pan (4):
> > mtd: nand_bbt: add new API definitions
> > mtd: nand_bbt: add nand_bbt_markbad_factory() interface
> > mtd: nand: use new BBT API instead of old ones
> > mtd: nand_bbt: remove old API definitions
> >
> > drivers/mtd/nand/docg4.c | 7 +-
> > drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 156 ++++++++++-
> > drivers/mtd/nand/nand_bbt.c | 604 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> > include/linux/mtd/bbm.h | 96 +------
> > include/linux/mtd/nand.h | 22 +-
> > include/linux/mtd/nand_bbt.h | 190 ++++++++++++++
> > 6 files changed, 644 insertions(+), 431 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 include/linux/mtd/nand_bbt.h
> >
> > --
> > 1.9.1
> >
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-16 12:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-14 2:47 [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT Peter Pan
2016-03-14 2:47 ` [PATCH 01/11] mtd: nand_bbt: new header for nand family BBT Peter Pan
2016-03-14 2:47 ` [PATCH 02/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce BBT related data structure Peter Pan
2016-03-25 8:35 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-28 8:09 ` Peter Pan
2016-03-29 8:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-18 6:22 ` Peter Pan
2016-04-18 7:44 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-19 0:40 ` Peter Pan
2016-04-19 7:34 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-05-04 1:36 ` Peter Pan
2016-05-04 20:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-05-17 1:03 ` Peter Pan
2016-06-17 2:38 ` Peter Pan
2016-06-21 13:27 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-14 2:47 ` [PATCH 03/11] mtd: nand_bbt: add new API definitions Peter Pan
2016-03-14 3:47 ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-25 8:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-28 7:56 ` Peter Pan
2016-03-14 2:47 ` [PATCH 04/11] mtd: nand_bbt: add nand_bbt_markbad_factory() interface Peter Pan
2016-03-14 2:47 ` [PATCH 05/11] mtd: nand: use new BBT API instead of old ones Peter Pan
2016-03-25 8:51 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-28 8:12 ` Peter Pan
2016-03-29 8:07 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-14 2:47 ` [PATCH 06/11] mtd: nand_bbt: use struct nand_bbt_ops in BBT Peter Pan
2016-03-14 2:48 ` [PATCH 07/11] mtd: nand: make nand_erase_nand() static Peter Pan
2016-03-14 2:48 ` [PATCH 08/11] mtd: nand_bbt: remove struct nand_chip from nand_bbt.c Peter Pan
2016-03-14 2:48 ` [PATCH 09/11] mtd: nand_bbt: remove old API definitions Peter Pan
2016-03-14 2:48 ` [PATCH 10/11] mtd: nand_bbt: remove NAND_BBT_DYNAMICSTRUCT macro Peter Pan
2016-03-14 2:48 ` [PATCH 11/11] mtd: nand: remove nand_chip.bbt Peter Pan
2016-03-14 2:57 ` [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT Peter Pan
2016-03-16 12:57 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-03-23 20:57 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2016-03-28 8:20 ` Peter Pan
2016-03-29 8:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-25 8:50 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-28 7:56 ` Peter Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160316135700.5e9593c7@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=karlzhang@micron.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=peterpandong@micron.com \
--cc=peterpansjtu@gmail.com \
--cc=xuejiancheng@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox