linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Peter Pan <peterpansjtu@gmail.com>
Cc: computersforpeace@gmail.com, dwmw2@infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	karlzhang@micron.com, beanhuo@micron.com,
	xuejiancheng@huawei.com, Peter Pan <peterpandong@micron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2016 09:50:15 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160325095015.341a11eb@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1457923684-13505-1-git-send-email-peterpandong@micron.com>

On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 02:47:53 +0000
Peter Pan <peterpansjtu@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry for send the v3 out late. I went through a busy time in the past
> two month.
> 
> Currently nand_bbt.c is tied with struct nand_chip, and it makes other
> NAND family chips hard to use nand_bbt.c. Maybe it's the reason why
> onenand has own bbt(onenand_bbt.c).
> 
> Separate struct nand_chip from BBT code can make current BBT shareable.
> We create struct nand_bbt to take place of nand_chip in nand_bbt.c.
> Struct nand_bbt contains all the information BBT needed from outside and
> it should be embedded into NAND family chip struct (such as struct nand_chip).
> 
> Below is mtd folder structure we want:
> 	drivers/mtd/nand/<all-nand-core-code>
> 	drivers/mtd/nand/raw/<raw-nand-controller-drivers>
> 	drivers/mtd/nand/spi/<spi-nand-code>
> 	drivers/mtd/nand/onenand/<onenand-code>
> 	drivers/mtd/nand/chips/<manufacturer-spcific-code>

Hm, we should have a chips directory under each interface type, because
vendor specific handling is dependent on the NAND interface.
Otherwise, yes, that's the idea.


-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-25  8:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-14  2:47 [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:47 ` [PATCH 01/11] mtd: nand_bbt: new header for nand family BBT Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:47 ` [PATCH 02/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce BBT related data structure Peter Pan
2016-03-25  8:35   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-28  8:09     ` Peter Pan
2016-03-29  8:16       ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-18  6:22     ` Peter Pan
2016-04-18  7:44       ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-19  0:40         ` Peter Pan
2016-04-19  7:34           ` Boris Brezillon
2016-05-04  1:36             ` Peter Pan
2016-05-04 20:33               ` Boris Brezillon
2016-05-17  1:03                 ` Peter Pan
2016-06-17  2:38                   ` Peter Pan
2016-06-21 13:27                     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-14  2:47 ` [PATCH 03/11] mtd: nand_bbt: add new API definitions Peter Pan
2016-03-14  3:47   ` kbuild test robot
2016-03-25  8:49   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-28  7:56     ` Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:47 ` [PATCH 04/11] mtd: nand_bbt: add nand_bbt_markbad_factory() interface Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:47 ` [PATCH 05/11] mtd: nand: use new BBT API instead of old ones Peter Pan
2016-03-25  8:51   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-28  8:12     ` Peter Pan
2016-03-29  8:07       ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-14  2:47 ` [PATCH 06/11] mtd: nand_bbt: use struct nand_bbt_ops in BBT Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:48 ` [PATCH 07/11] mtd: nand: make nand_erase_nand() static Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:48 ` [PATCH 08/11] mtd: nand_bbt: remove struct nand_chip from nand_bbt.c Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:48 ` [PATCH 09/11] mtd: nand_bbt: remove old API definitions Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:48 ` [PATCH 10/11] mtd: nand_bbt: remove NAND_BBT_DYNAMICSTRUCT macro Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:48 ` [PATCH 11/11] mtd: nand: remove nand_chip.bbt Peter Pan
2016-03-14  2:57 ` [PATCH 00/11] mtd: nand_bbt: introduce independent nand BBT Peter Pan
2016-03-16 12:57   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-23 20:57 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2016-03-28  8:20   ` Peter Pan
2016-03-29  8:02     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-03-25  8:50 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-03-28  7:56   ` Peter Pan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160325095015.341a11eb@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=karlzhang@micron.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=peterpandong@micron.com \
    --cc=peterpansjtu@gmail.com \
    --cc=xuejiancheng@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).