From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Harvey Hunt <harvey.hunt@imgtec.com>
Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: document the NAND controller/NAND chip DT representation
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 17:19:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160331171942.622d03aa@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56FD3F0E.9080306@imgtec.com>
On Thu, 31 Mar 2016 16:15:26 +0100
Harvey Hunt <harvey.hunt@imgtec.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On 31/03/16 14:57, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > Standardize the NAND controller/NAND chip DT representation. Now, all new
> > NAND controller drivers should comply with this representation, even if
> > they are only supporting a single NAND chip.
> >
> > Existing drivers can keep support for the old representation (where only
> > the NAND chip was described), but are encouraged to also support the new
> > one.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt
> > index b53f92e..fbf5677 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/nand.txt
> > @@ -1,4 +1,23 @@
> > -* MTD generic binding
> > +* NAND chip and NAND controller generic binding
> > +
> > +NAND controller/NAND chip representation:
> > +
> > +The NAND controller should be represented with it's own DT node, and all
>
> s/it's/its/
Yep, I'll fix that.
>
> > +NAND chips attached to this controller should be defined as children nodes
> > +of the NAND controller. This representation should be enforced even for
> > +simple controllers supporting only one chip.
> > +
> > +Mandatory NAND controller properties:
> > +- #address-cells: depends on your controller. Should at least be 1 to
> > + encode the CS line id.
> > +- #size-cells: depends on your controller. Put zero unless you need a
> > + mapping between CS lines and dedicated memory regions
> > +
> > +Optional NAND controller properties
> > +- ranges: only needed if you need to define a mapping between CS lines and
> > + memory regions
> > +
> > +Optional NAND chip properties:
> >
> > - nand-ecc-mode : String, operation mode of the NAND ecc mode.
> > Supported values are: "none", "soft", "hw", "hw_syndrome", "hw_oob_first",
> > @@ -19,3 +38,19 @@ errors per {size} bytes".
> > The interpretation of these parameters is implementation-defined, so not all
> > implementations must support all possible combinations. However, implementations
> > are encouraged to further specify the value(s) they support.
> > +
> > +Example:
> > +
> > + nand-controller {
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + /* controller specific properties */
> > +
> > + nand@0 {
> > + reg = <0>;
> > + nand-ecc-mode = "soft_bch";
> > +
> > + /* controller specific properties */
>
> Did you mean "chip specific properties"?
No, it's really "controller specific properties". Those are properties
prefixed by the controller vendor name (like 'allwinner,rb' which is
encoding the native ready/busy pin to be attached to this chip).
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-31 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-31 13:57 [PATCH] mtd: nand: document the NAND controller/NAND chip DT representation Boris Brezillon
2016-03-31 15:15 ` Harvey Hunt
2016-03-31 15:19 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-03-31 15:22 ` Harvey Hunt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160331171942.622d03aa@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=harvey.hunt@imgtec.com \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).