From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mtd: introduce the mtd_pairing_scheme concept
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 23:22:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160613062229.GA115118@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160613055532.GB107340@google.com>
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 10:55:32PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 08:54:08AM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 19:17:15 -0700
> > Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
> > > Also, the "pair" term (and examples you use) seem to imply 2-cell MLC,
> > > whereas I believe you're trying to handle TLC too. I don't know if we
> > > should drop the "pair" term, or just explain it better.
> >
> > I clearly have some problems with the words I've chosen, but those terms
> > were extracted from NAND datasheets (group and pair), and I think
> > keeping the same wording help people converting datasheet specs into
> > pairing scheme implementation.
> >
> > Any suggestions to replace those 2 words?
>
> I'm not sure we should replace the words (esp. if those are used by
> multiple vendors). [...]
I see that George highlighted a Micron datasheet in other parts of this
thread, and I noticed it uses the term "shared page." That explains why
I couldn't find the word "pair" in my quick search of Micron datasheets!
So I guess "shared page" would be a nomination, though I'm certainly not
forcing it, if you think pair is better.
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-25 10:01 [PATCH 0/4] mtd: add support for pairing scheme description Boris Brezillon
2016-04-25 10:01 ` [PATCH 1/4] mtd: introduce the mtd_pairing_scheme concept Boris Brezillon
2016-06-11 2:17 ` Brian Norris
2016-06-11 6:54 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-13 5:55 ` Brian Norris
2016-06-13 6:22 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2016-06-13 6:37 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-04-25 10:01 ` [PATCH 2/4] mtd: nand: implement two pairing scheme Boris Brezillon
2016-04-25 10:01 ` [PATCH 3/4] mtd: nand: add a pairing field to nand_flash_dev Boris Brezillon
2016-04-25 10:01 ` [PATCH 4/4] mtd: nand: H27UCG8T2ATR: point to the correct pairing scheme implementation Boris Brezillon
2016-04-28 8:04 ` [PATCH 0/4] mtd: add support for pairing scheme description Richard Weinberger
2016-06-11 2:16 ` Brian Norris
2016-06-11 6:45 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-13 5:54 ` Brian Norris
2016-06-13 6:33 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160613062229.GA115118@google.com \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).