From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238] helo=mail.free-electrons.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bEbzs-0002mY-MB for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 19 Jun 2016 12:38:41 +0000 Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 14:38:18 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Hauke Mehrtens Cc: richard@nod.at, dwmw2@infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, john@phrozen.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] MTD: xway: add missing write_buf and read_buf to nand driver Message-ID: <20160619143818.1a0f556f@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <1466277252-13867-6-git-send-email-hauke@hauke-m.de> References: <1466277252-13867-1-git-send-email-hauke@hauke-m.de> <1466277252-13867-6-git-send-email-hauke@hauke-m.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 21:14:09 +0200 Hauke Mehrtens wrote: Please add a commit message. > From: John Crispin > > Signed-off-by: John Crispin > Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c > index 61176c4..1511bdb 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c > @@ -151,6 +151,33 @@ static unsigned char xway_read_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd) > return ret; > } > > + > +static void xway_read_buf(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char *buf, int len) > +{ > + struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd); > + unsigned long nandaddr = (unsigned long) this->IO_ADDR_R; > + unsigned long flags; > + int i; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&ebu_lock, flags); > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) > + buf[i] = ltq_r8((void __iomem *)(nandaddr | NAND_READ_DATA)); Please remove these useless cast and use the + operator. buf[i] = ltq_r8(this->IO_ADDR_R + NAND_READ_DATA); > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ebu_lock, flags); Reading data through the NAND bus can be quite long, do you really need to take a spinlock and disable irqs for while doing that? A mutex would be more appropriate IMO. > +} > + > +static void xway_write_buf(struct mtd_info *mtd, const u_char *buf, int len) > +{ > + struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd); > + unsigned long nandaddr = (unsigned long) this->IO_ADDR_W; > + unsigned long flags; > + int i; > + > + spin_lock_irqsave(&ebu_lock, flags); > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) > + ltq_w8(buf[i], (void __iomem *)(nandaddr | NAND_WRITE_DATA)); Ditto. > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ebu_lock, flags); > +} > + > /* > * Probe for the NAND device. > */ > @@ -184,6 +211,8 @@ static int xway_nand_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > data->chip.cmd_ctrl = xway_cmd_ctrl; > data->chip.dev_ready = xway_dev_ready; > data->chip.select_chip = xway_select_chip; > + data->chip.write_buf = xway_write_buf; > + data->chip.read_buf = xway_read_buf; > data->chip.read_byte = xway_read_byte; > data->chip.chip_delay = 30; >