public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Cc: richard@nod.at, dwmw2@infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, john@phrozen.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] MTD: xway: fix nand locking
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 14:41:52 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160619144152.4ba4de77@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466277252-13867-7-git-send-email-hauke@hauke-m.de>

On Sat, 18 Jun 2016 21:14:10 +0200
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de> wrote:

> From: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
> 
> The external Bus Unit (EBU) can control different flash devices, but
> these NAND flash commands have to be atomic and should not be
> interrupted in between. Lock the EBU from the beginning of the command
> till the end by moving the lock to the chip select.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>
> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
> ---
>  drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c | 20 ++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c
> index 1511bdb..064ee41 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/xway_nand.c
> @@ -94,13 +94,16 @@ static void xway_reset_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
>  
>  static void xway_select_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd, int chip)
>  {
> +	static unsigned long csflags;
>  
>  	switch (chip) {
>  	case -1:
>  		ltq_ebu_w32_mask(NAND_CON_CE, 0, EBU_NAND_CON);
>  		ltq_ebu_w32_mask(NAND_CON_NANDM, 0, EBU_NAND_CON);
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ebu_lock, csflags);
>  		break;
>  	case 0:
> +		spin_lock_irqsave(&ebu_lock, csflags);
>  		ltq_ebu_w32_mask(0, NAND_CON_NANDM, EBU_NAND_CON);
>  		ltq_ebu_w32_mask(0, NAND_CON_CE, EBU_NAND_CON);

So now the spinlock is taken (and irq disabled) during the whole NAND
operation. Ouch! I hope you don't have real-time constraints in your
system.

>  		break;
> @@ -114,7 +117,6 @@ static void xway_cmd_ctrl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd, unsigned int ctrl)
>  	struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
>  	struct xway_nand_data *data = nand_get_controller_data(chip);
>  	unsigned long nandaddr = (unsigned long) chip->IO_ADDR_W;
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  
>  	if (ctrl & NAND_CTRL_CHANGE) {
>  		if (ctrl & NAND_CLE)
> @@ -124,11 +126,9 @@ static void xway_cmd_ctrl(struct mtd_info *mtd, int cmd, unsigned int ctrl)
>  	}
>  
>  	if (cmd != NAND_CMD_NONE) {
> -		spin_lock_irqsave(&ebu_lock, flags);
>  		writeb(cmd, (void __iomem *) (nandaddr | data->xway_latchcmd));
>  		while ((ltq_ebu_r32(EBU_NAND_WAIT) & NAND_WAIT_WR_C) == 0)
>  			;
> -		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ebu_lock, flags);
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -141,14 +141,8 @@ static unsigned char xway_read_byte(struct mtd_info *mtd)
>  {
>  	struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
>  	unsigned long nandaddr = (unsigned long) this->IO_ADDR_R;
> -	unsigned long flags;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ebu_lock, flags);
> -	ret = ltq_r8((void __iomem *)(nandaddr + NAND_READ_DATA));
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ebu_lock, flags);
>  
> -	return ret;
> +	return ltq_r8((void __iomem *)(nandaddr + NAND_READ_DATA));
>  }
>  
>  
> @@ -156,26 +150,20 @@ static void xway_read_buf(struct mtd_info *mtd, u_char *buf, int len)
>  {
>  	struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
>  	unsigned long nandaddr = (unsigned long) this->IO_ADDR_R;
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ebu_lock, flags);
>  	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>  		buf[i] = ltq_r8((void __iomem *)(nandaddr | NAND_READ_DATA));
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ebu_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
>  static void xway_write_buf(struct mtd_info *mtd, const u_char *buf, int len)
>  {
>  	struct nand_chip *this = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
>  	unsigned long nandaddr = (unsigned long) this->IO_ADDR_W;
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  	int i;
>  
> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ebu_lock, flags);
>  	for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
>  		ltq_w8(buf[i], (void __iomem *)(nandaddr | NAND_WRITE_DATA));
> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ebu_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
>  /*

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-19 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-18 19:14 [PATCH v2 0/8] MTD: xway: fix driver Hauke Mehrtens
2016-06-18 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] MTD: xway: convert to normal platform driver Hauke Mehrtens
2016-06-19 11:32   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-19 11:58     ` Hauke Mehrtens
2016-06-18 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] MTD: xway: add some more documentation Hauke Mehrtens
2016-06-19 11:39   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-18 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] MTD: xway: the latched command should be persistent Hauke Mehrtens
2016-06-19 11:52   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-19 12:04     ` Hauke Mehrtens
2016-06-19 12:09       ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-18 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] MTD: xway: remove endless loop Hauke Mehrtens
2016-06-19 12:14   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-19 12:32     ` Hauke Mehrtens
2016-06-19 12:57       ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-18 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] MTD: xway: add missing write_buf and read_buf to nand driver Hauke Mehrtens
2016-06-19 12:38   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-18 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] MTD: xway: fix nand locking Hauke Mehrtens
2016-06-19 12:41   ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-06-19 12:53     ` Richard Weinberger
2016-06-19 12:56       ` Hauke Mehrtens
2016-06-19 13:04         ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-19 12:58       ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-18 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] MTD: xway: extract read and write function Hauke Mehrtens
2016-06-19 12:42   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-18 19:14 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] MTD: xway: use global NAND_CMD_RESET define Hauke Mehrtens
2016-06-19 13:06   ` Boris Brezillon
2016-06-19 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] MTD: xway: fix driver Boris Brezillon
2016-06-19 13:13   ` Hauke Mehrtens

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160619144152.4ba4de77@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox