From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from down.free-electrons.com ([37.187.137.238] helo=mail.free-electrons.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bSsiK-0003s4-6I for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 28 Jul 2016 21:19:32 +0000 Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:18:59 +0200 From: Thomas Petazzoni To: Richard Weinberger Cc: David Oberhollenzer , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com, gustavo@zacarias.com.ar, otavio@debian.org, riku.voipio@linaro.org, pascal.bleser@opensuse.org, mpluskal@suse.com, David Woodhouse Subject: Re: mtd-utils: Swtich to autotools based build system Message-ID: <20160728231859.5d9f0a6a@free-electrons.com> In-Reply-To: <579A737A.6090308@nod.at> References: <20160725150234.5276-1-david.oberhollenzer@sigma-star.at> <579A737A.6090308@nod.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hello, On Thu, 28 Jul 2016 23:04:58 +0200, Richard Weinberger wrote: > Let's ask also package maintainers for their opinion. > They have to (cross)build and package mtd-utils. :-) I haven't tested David patches yet, but what I can say is that moving to autotools is definitely a very, very wise move. Non-standard hand-written Makefiles are really a pain. I'll try to give it a test in terms of Buildroot packaging, and report back. Thanks, Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com