From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bn3nam01on0095.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([104.47.33.95] helo=NAM01-BN3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.85_2 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1bYIPo-0005yq-1Q for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 12 Aug 2016 19:46:49 +0000 Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2016 14:47:29 -0500 From: Kyle Roeschley To: Boris Brezillon CC: , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] mtd: nand_bbt: Move BBT block selection logic out of write_bbt() Message-ID: <20160812194729.GA16998@senary> References: <1471024490-32348-1-git-send-email-kyle.roeschley@ni.com> <20160812211503.484e3553@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160812211503.484e3553@bbrezillon> List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Boris, On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 09:15:03PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Hi Kyle, > > On Fri, 12 Aug 2016 12:54:49 -0500 > Kyle Roeschley wrote: > > > From: Boris Brezillon > > > > This clarifies the write_bbt() by removing the write label and clarifying > > the error/exit path. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > > Just want to make sure you actually tested those patches, because I > didn't :). > > Can you add your Tested-by on this one and confirm you've tested patch > 2 as well. Whoops, I goofed and only tested with both patches applied. Thanks for the catch. I'll go ahead and test the first alone and submit a v7. Regards, -- Kyle Roeschley Software Engineer National Instruments