* [PATCH 3/3] init: auto-create ubiblock device for non-UBIFS rootfs on UBI
@ 2016-08-27 19:44 Daniel Golle
2016-08-28 16:54 ` Boris Brezillon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Golle @ 2016-08-27 19:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mtd
Cc: Richard Weinberger, Ralph Sennhauser, Zoltan HERPAI,
Hauke Mehrtens, lede-dev, openwrt-devel
Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
---
init/do_mounts.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/init/do_mounts.c b/init/do_mounts.c
index dea5de9..485df12 100644
--- a/init/do_mounts.c
+++ b/init/do_mounts.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/ramfs.h>
#include <linux/shmem_fs.h>
+#include <linux/mtd/ubi.h>
#include <linux/nfs_fs.h>
#include <linux/nfs_fs_sb.h>
@@ -179,6 +180,47 @@ done:
}
#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BLOCK) && !defined(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_MODULE)
+#define UBIFS_NODE_MAGIC 0x06101831
+static inline int ubi_vol_is_ubifs(struct ubi_volume_desc *desc)
+{
+ int ret;
+ uint32_t magic_of, magic;
+ ret = ubi_read(desc, 0, (char *)&magic_of, 0, 4);
+ if (ret)
+ return 0;
+ magic = le32_to_cpu(magic_of);
+ return magic == UBIFS_NODE_MAGIC;
+}
+
+static void ubiblock_create_rootdev(char *name)
+{
+ int ret, is_ubifs;
+ struct ubi_volume_desc *desc;
+ struct ubi_volume_info vi;
+ dev_t bdev;
+
+ desc = ubi_open_volume_str(name, UBI_READONLY);
+ if (IS_ERR(desc))
+ return;
+
+ ubi_get_volume_info(desc, &vi);
+
+ is_ubifs = ubi_vol_is_ubifs(desc);
+ ubi_close_volume(desc);
+
+ if (is_ubifs)
+ return;
+
+ ret = ubiblock_create_dev(&vi, &bdev);
+ if (!ret) {
+ pr_notice("ubiblock%u_%u: '%s' set to be root filesystem\n",
+ vi.ubi_num, vi.vol_id, vi.name);
+ ROOT_DEV = bdev;
+ }
+}
+#endif
+
/*
* Convert a name into device number. We accept the following variants:
*
@@ -569,14 +611,20 @@ void __init prepare_namespace(void)
if (saved_root_name[0]) {
root_device_name = saved_root_name;
- if (!strncmp(root_device_name, "mtd", 3) ||
- !strncmp(root_device_name, "ubi", 3)) {
- mount_block_root(root_device_name, root_mountflags);
- goto out;
+#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BLOCK) && !defined(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_MODULE)
+ if (!strncmp(root_device_name, "ubi", 3))
+ ubiblock_create_rootdev(root_device_name);
+#endif
+ if (ROOT_DEV == 0) {
+ if (!strncmp(root_device_name, "mtd", 3) ||
+ !strncmp(root_device_name, "ubi", 3)) {
+ mount_block_root(root_device_name, root_mountflags);
+ goto out;
+ }
+ ROOT_DEV = name_to_dev_t(root_device_name);
+ if (strncmp(root_device_name, "/dev/", 5) == 0)
+ root_device_name += 5;
}
- ROOT_DEV = name_to_dev_t(root_device_name);
- if (strncmp(root_device_name, "/dev/", 5) == 0)
- root_device_name += 5;
}
if (initrd_load())
--
2.9.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] init: auto-create ubiblock device for non-UBIFS rootfs on UBI
2016-08-27 19:44 [PATCH 3/3] init: auto-create ubiblock device for non-UBIFS rootfs on UBI Daniel Golle
@ 2016-08-28 16:54 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-08-28 21:22 ` Daniel Golle
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Boris Brezillon @ 2016-08-28 16:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Golle
Cc: linux-mtd, Richard Weinberger, lede-dev, Zoltan HERPAI,
Hauke Mehrtens, Ralph Sennhauser, openwrt-devel
On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 21:44:46 +0200
Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
> ---
> init/do_mounts.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/do_mounts.c b/init/do_mounts.c
> index dea5de9..485df12 100644
> --- a/init/do_mounts.c
> +++ b/init/do_mounts.c
> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/ramfs.h>
> #include <linux/shmem_fs.h>
> +#include <linux/mtd/ubi.h>
Really??? You include UBI stuff in generic kernel code? Come on. Linux
is defining clear interfaces to be implemented by drivers/FS for a good
reason: the core code should be implementation agnostic, and you're
just breaking this rule.
>
> #include <linux/nfs_fs.h>
> #include <linux/nfs_fs_sb.h>
> @@ -179,6 +180,47 @@ done:
> }
> #endif
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BLOCK) && !defined(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_MODULE)
> +#define UBIFS_NODE_MAGIC 0x06101831
> +static inline int ubi_vol_is_ubifs(struct ubi_volume_desc *desc)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + uint32_t magic_of, magic;
> + ret = ubi_read(desc, 0, (char *)&magic_of, 0, 4);
> + if (ret)
> + return 0;
> + magic = le32_to_cpu(magic_of);
> + return magic == UBIFS_NODE_MAGIC;
> +}
This is even worst. Now your parsing data within a specific volume to
determine if the volume is likely to contain a UBIFS FS. And all that
is done in core kernel code.
> +
> +static void ubiblock_create_rootdev(char *name)
> +{
> + int ret, is_ubifs;
> + struct ubi_volume_desc *desc;
> + struct ubi_volume_info vi;
> + dev_t bdev;
> +
> + desc = ubi_open_volume_str(name, UBI_READONLY);
> + if (IS_ERR(desc))
> + return;
> +
> + ubi_get_volume_info(desc, &vi);
> +
> + is_ubifs = ubi_vol_is_ubifs(desc);
> + ubi_close_volume(desc);
> +
> + if (is_ubifs)
> + return;
> +
> + ret = ubiblock_create_dev(&vi, &bdev);
> + if (!ret) {
> + pr_notice("ubiblock%u_%u: '%s' set to be root filesystem\n",
> + vi.ubi_num, vi.vol_id, vi.name);
> + ROOT_DEV = bdev;
> + }
> +}
And it continues here. Now you're automatically creating a ubiblock
device based on the UBIFS detection, and again, this is in core kernel
code.
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Convert a name into device number. We accept the following variants:
> *
> @@ -569,14 +611,20 @@ void __init prepare_namespace(void)
>
> if (saved_root_name[0]) {
> root_device_name = saved_root_name;
> - if (!strncmp(root_device_name, "mtd", 3) ||
> - !strncmp(root_device_name, "ubi", 3)) {
> - mount_block_root(root_device_name, root_mountflags);
> - goto out;
> +#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BLOCK) && !defined(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_MODULE)
> + if (!strncmp(root_device_name, "ubi", 3))
> + ubiblock_create_rootdev(root_device_name);
> +#endif
> + if (ROOT_DEV == 0) {
> + if (!strncmp(root_device_name, "mtd", 3) ||
> + !strncmp(root_device_name, "ubi", 3)) {
> + mount_block_root(root_device_name, root_mountflags);
> + goto out;
> + }
> + ROOT_DEV = name_to_dev_t(root_device_name);
> + if (strncmp(root_device_name, "/dev/", 5) == 0)
> + root_device_name += 5;
> }
> - ROOT_DEV = name_to_dev_t(root_device_name);
> - if (strncmp(root_device_name, "/dev/", 5) == 0)
> - root_device_name += 5;
And the last piece: you're making use of all the hacks you've
introduced earlier to create your blockdevice and pass it to the 'mount
blockdev FS' logic.
I hope you understand why this patch is not acceptable.
> }
>
> if (initrd_load())
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 3/3] init: auto-create ubiblock device for non-UBIFS rootfs on UBI
2016-08-28 16:54 ` Boris Brezillon
@ 2016-08-28 21:22 ` Daniel Golle
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Golle @ 2016-08-28 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Boris Brezillon
Cc: linux-mtd, Richard Weinberger, lede-dev, Zoltan HERPAI,
Hauke Mehrtens, Ralph Sennhauser, openwrt-devel
Hi Boris,
thanks for the review! This is more helpful and more of the type of
feedback I was hoping for.
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 06:54:15PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Aug 2016 21:44:46 +0200
> Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org> wrote:
>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
> > ---
> > init/do_mounts.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/init/do_mounts.c b/init/do_mounts.c
> > index dea5de9..485df12 100644
> > --- a/init/do_mounts.c
> > +++ b/init/do_mounts.c
> > @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
> > #include <linux/slab.h>
> > #include <linux/ramfs.h>
> > #include <linux/shmem_fs.h>
> > +#include <linux/mtd/ubi.h>
>
> Really??? You include UBI stuff in generic kernel code? Come on. Linux
> is defining clear interfaces to be implemented by drivers/FS for a good
> reason: the core code should be implementation agnostic, and you're
> just breaking this rule.
The whole thing could be moved to a new file (similar as done for other
things for specific subsystems, like do_mounts_md.c).
>
> >
> > #include <linux/nfs_fs.h>
> > #include <linux/nfs_fs_sb.h>
> > @@ -179,6 +180,47 @@ done:
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BLOCK) && !defined(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_MODULE)
> > +#define UBIFS_NODE_MAGIC 0x06101831
> > +static inline int ubi_vol_is_ubifs(struct ubi_volume_desc *desc)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + uint32_t magic_of, magic;
> > + ret = ubi_read(desc, 0, (char *)&magic_of, 0, 4);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return 0;
> > + magic = le32_to_cpu(magic_of);
> > + return magic == UBIFS_NODE_MAGIC;
> > +}
>
> This is even worst. Now your parsing data within a specific volume to
> determine if the volume is likely to contain a UBIFS FS. And all that
> is done in core kernel code.
I was unsure, however, maybe ubiblock should generally refuse to create
a ubiblock device if an UBIFS signature is found...?
In that case, this function and the logic using it below could be moved
to driver/mtd/ubi/block.c
>
> > +
> > +static void ubiblock_create_rootdev(char *name)
> > +{
> > + int ret, is_ubifs;
> > + struct ubi_volume_desc *desc;
> > + struct ubi_volume_info vi;
> > + dev_t bdev;
> > +
> > + desc = ubi_open_volume_str(name, UBI_READONLY);
> > + if (IS_ERR(desc))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + ubi_get_volume_info(desc, &vi);
> > +
> > + is_ubifs = ubi_vol_is_ubifs(desc);
> > + ubi_close_volume(desc);
> > +
> > + if (is_ubifs)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + ret = ubiblock_create_dev(&vi, &bdev);
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + pr_notice("ubiblock%u_%u: '%s' set to be root filesystem\n",
> > + vi.ubi_num, vi.vol_id, vi.name);
> > + ROOT_DEV = bdev;
> > + }
> > +}
>
> And it continues here. Now you're automatically creating a ubiblock
> device based on the UBIFS detection, and again, this is in core kernel
> code.
This, again, could go into a file of it's own like
init/do_mounts_ubiblock.c
which is just how it's done for ramdisk and mdraid stuff.
>
> > +#endif
> > +
> > /*
> > * Convert a name into device number. We accept the following variants:
> > *
> > @@ -569,14 +611,20 @@ void __init prepare_namespace(void)
> >
> > if (saved_root_name[0]) {
> > root_device_name = saved_root_name;
> > - if (!strncmp(root_device_name, "mtd", 3) ||
> > - !strncmp(root_device_name, "ubi", 3)) {
> > - mount_block_root(root_device_name, root_mountflags);
> > - goto out;
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_BLOCK) && !defined(CONFIG_MTD_UBI_MODULE)
> > + if (!strncmp(root_device_name, "ubi", 3))
> > + ubiblock_create_rootdev(root_device_name);
> > +#endif
> > + if (ROOT_DEV == 0) {
> > + if (!strncmp(root_device_name, "mtd", 3) ||
> > + !strncmp(root_device_name, "ubi", 3)) {
> > + mount_block_root(root_device_name, root_mountflags);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + ROOT_DEV = name_to_dev_t(root_device_name);
> > + if (strncmp(root_device_name, "/dev/", 5) == 0)
> > + root_device_name += 5;
> > }
> > - ROOT_DEV = name_to_dev_t(root_device_name);
> > - if (strncmp(root_device_name, "/dev/", 5) == 0)
> > - root_device_name += 5;
>
> And the last piece: you're making use of all the hacks you've
> introduced earlier to create your blockdevice and pass it to the 'mount
> blockdev FS' logic.
This is what is done for all sorts of block devices in that function...
What's wrong with that approach?
>
> I hope you understand why this patch is not acceptable.
I surely do, it was sent in the intention to start a discussion and
collect comments, not with the intention to have it merged at this
stage. I thus really appreciate your detailed review, though I'm aware
that you are opposed to the whole idea of automagically creating the
ubiblock device and thereby allowing to unify the rootfs= cmdline
syntax to be agnostic to the filesystem-type used.
Well, thank you anyway.
Cheers
Daniel
>
> > }
> >
> > if (initrd_load())
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-08-28 21:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-08-27 19:44 [PATCH 3/3] init: auto-create ubiblock device for non-UBIFS rootfs on UBI Daniel Golle
2016-08-28 16:54 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-08-28 21:22 ` Daniel Golle
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox