From: Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
lede-dev@lists.infradead.org,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Zoltan HERPAI <wigyori@uid0.hu>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>,
Ralph Sennhauser <ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com>,
openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/3] UBI: unify mouting rootfs based on cmdline parameter
Date: Sun, 28 Aug 2016 16:27:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160828142747.GD1623@makrotopia.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAEAJfA5zgJDGm=Vdewxb8nh-n-7Ez-HWGCORHyGvD_ku1YxLA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Ezequiel,
On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 11:12:50AM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> Let's try to tackle this from a different angle.
>
> On 27 August 2016 at 16:43, Daniel Golle <daniel@makrotopia.org> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > In an attempts to fix the flaws of the current set of UBI-related
> > patches we are carrying in OpenWrt, I re-wrote the way mounting the
> > rootfs from UBI in OpenWrt/LEDE works. The main requirement I face
> > which cannot be easily addressed using other means which are already
> > available in the kernel is the fact that UBIFS and squashfs-on-UBI
> > require different parameters to be set on the cmdline, e.g.
> > for UBIFS: ubi.mtd=ubi root=ubi0:rootfs rootfstype=ubifs
> > for squashfs: ubi.mtd=ubi ubiblock=0,1 root=/dev/ubiblock0_1 rootfstype=squashfs
> >
>
> Can you help me understand the problem you are solving here?
>
> So you currently need to do:
>
> * for UBIFS: ubi.mtd=ubi root=ubi0:rootfs rootfstype=ubifs
> * for squashfs: ubi.mtd=ubi ubi.block=0,1 root=/dev/ubiblock0_1
> rootfstype=squashfs
>
> [..]
> >
> > With those changes, a single set of cmdline parameters is
> > sufficient to mount either UBIFS or any other block filesystem
> > by creating a ubiblock device:
> > ubi.mtd=ubi root=ubi0:rootfs rootfstype=ubifs,squashfs
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
this is the goal state :)
> >
>
> And you would like to do:
>
> * for UBIFS: ubi.mtd=ubi root=ubi0:rootfs rootfstype=ubifs
> * for squashfs: ubi.mtd=ubi root=/dev/ubiblock0_1 rootfstype=squashfs
I do NOT want to pass different cmdlines depending on the filesystem
type. The lines quote above were to illustrate the current
inconsistency of cmdline parameters.
>
> So the only thing you are trying to acomplish, is removal
> of the ubi.block parameter needed to create ubi block devices.
>
> Is that correct?
Almost. I want a single syntax for rootfs= to refer to the rootfs
volume, no matter what the filesystem type is. Hence, in case of
non-UBIFS filesystem, a ubiblock needs to be created and mounted.
Cheers
Daniel
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Ezequiel García, VanguardiaSur
> www.vanguardiasur.com.ar
>
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-08-28 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-27 19:43 [PATCH/RFC 0/3] UBI: unify mouting rootfs based on cmdline parameter Daniel Golle
2016-08-27 20:43 ` Richard Weinberger
2016-08-27 21:06 ` Daniel Golle
2016-08-27 21:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2016-08-27 23:13 ` Daniel Golle
2016-08-27 23:33 ` Richard Weinberger
2016-08-28 6:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-08-28 7:10 ` Ralph Sennhauser
2016-08-28 8:12 ` Richard Weinberger
2016-08-28 9:19 ` Ralph Sennhauser
2016-08-28 9:28 ` Richard Weinberger
2016-08-28 11:44 ` Daniel Golle
2016-08-28 11:57 ` Richard Weinberger
2016-08-28 13:47 ` Daniel Golle
2016-08-28 14:17 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-08-28 12:10 ` Ralph Sennhauser
2016-08-28 13:24 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-08-28 14:12 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2016-08-28 14:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-08-28 14:25 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2016-08-28 14:40 ` Daniel Golle
2016-08-28 15:00 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-08-28 15:24 ` Daniel Golle
2016-08-28 16:35 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-08-28 14:32 ` Daniel Golle
2016-08-28 14:27 ` Daniel Golle [this message]
2016-08-28 14:54 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160828142747.GD1623@makrotopia.org \
--to=daniel@makrotopia.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=ezequiel@vanguardiasur.com.ar \
--cc=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=lede-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=openwrt-devel@lists.openwrt.org \
--cc=ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=wigyori@uid0.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox