From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 10:09:11 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: RogerCC Lin Cc: , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mtd: nand: fix generating over-boundary ECC data when writing Message-ID: <20160831100911.2926b969@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <1472560548-30567-2-git-send-email-rogercc.lin@mediatek.com> References: <1472560548-30567-1-git-send-email-rogercc.lin@mediatek.com> <1472560548-30567-2-git-send-email-rogercc.lin@mediatek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:35:47 +0800 RogerCC Lin wrote: > From: RogerCC Lin > > When mtk_ecc_encode() is writing the ECC parity data to the OOB > region,because each register is 4 bytes in length,but the len's unit is > in bytes,the operation in the for loop will cross the ECC's boundary. > > Signed-off-by: RogerCC Lin > --- > drivers/mtd/nand/mtk_ecc.c | 12 ++++++++---- > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/mtk_ecc.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/mtk_ecc.c > index 25a4fbd..495538e 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mtk_ecc.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mtk_ecc.c > @@ -366,7 +366,8 @@ int mtk_ecc_encode(struct mtk_ecc *ecc, struct mtk_ecc_config *config, > u8 *data, u32 bytes) > { > dma_addr_t addr; > - u32 *p, len, i; > + u8 *p; > + u32 len, i, val; > int ret = 0; > > addr = dma_map_single(ecc->dev, data, bytes, DMA_TO_DEVICE); > @@ -392,11 +393,14 @@ int mtk_ecc_encode(struct mtk_ecc *ecc, struct mtk_ecc_config *config, > > /* Program ECC bytes to OOB: per sector oob = FDM + ECC + SPARE */ > len = (config->strength * ECC_PARITY_BITS + 7) >> 3; > - p = (u32 *)(data + bytes); > + p = data + bytes; > > /* write the parity bytes generated by the ECC back to the OOB region */ > - for (i = 0; i < len; i++) > - p[i] = readl(ecc->regs + ECC_ENCPAR(i)); > + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) { > + if ((i % 4) == 0) > + val = readl(ecc->regs + ECC_ENCPAR(i >> 2)); I'm nitpicking, but I'd prefer to have 'i / 4' instead of 'i >> 2' to be consistent with the 'i % 4' operation, and I also find it clearer. If you agree, I can do this change while applying the patch, no need to resend. > + p[i] = (val >> ((i % 4) * 8)) & 0xff; > + } > timeout: > > dma_unmap_single(ecc->dev, addr, bytes, DMA_TO_DEVICE);