From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: "Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Artem Bityutskiy" <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
"Adrian Hunter" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ubifs: drop softlimit and delta fields from struct ubifs_wbuf
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:40:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160914174010.3838e142@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160914102435.22312-2-zajec5@gmail.com>
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 12:24:34 +0200
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>
> Values of these fields are set during init and never modified. They are
> used (read) in a single function only. There isn't really any reason to
> keep them in a struct. It only makes struct just a bit bigger without
> any clear gain.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> fs/ubifs/io.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
> fs/ubifs/ubifs.h | 5 -----
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/io.c b/fs/ubifs/io.c
> index 97be412..4d6ce4a 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/io.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/io.c
> @@ -452,16 +452,22 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart wbuf_timer_callback_nolock(struct hrtimer *timer)
> */
> static void new_wbuf_timer_nolock(struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf)
> {
> + ktime_t softlimit = ktime_set(WBUF_TIMEOUT_SOFTLIMIT, 0);
> + unsigned long long delta;
> +
> + delta = WBUF_TIMEOUT_HARDLIMIT - WBUF_TIMEOUT_SOFTLIMIT;
> + delta *= 1000000000ULL;
> +
> ubifs_assert(!hrtimer_active(&wbuf->timer));
> + ubifs_assert(delta <= ULONG_MAX);
>
> if (wbuf->no_timer)
> return;
> dbg_io("set timer for jhead %s, %llu-%llu millisecs",
> dbg_jhead(wbuf->jhead),
> - div_u64(ktime_to_ns(wbuf->softlimit), USEC_PER_SEC),
> - div_u64(ktime_to_ns(wbuf->softlimit) + wbuf->delta,
> - USEC_PER_SEC));
> - hrtimer_start_range_ns(&wbuf->timer, wbuf->softlimit, wbuf->delta,
> + div_u64(ktime_to_ns(softlimit), USEC_PER_SEC),
> + div_u64(ktime_to_ns(softlimit) + delta, USEC_PER_SEC));
> + hrtimer_start_range_ns(&wbuf->timer, softlimit, delta,
> HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> }
>
> @@ -1059,10 +1065,6 @@ int ubifs_wbuf_init(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf)
>
> hrtimer_init(&wbuf->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> wbuf->timer.function = wbuf_timer_callback_nolock;
> - wbuf->softlimit = ktime_set(WBUF_TIMEOUT_SOFTLIMIT, 0);
> - wbuf->delta = WBUF_TIMEOUT_HARDLIMIT - WBUF_TIMEOUT_SOFTLIMIT;
> - wbuf->delta *= 1000000000ULL;
> - ubifs_assert(wbuf->delta <= ULONG_MAX);
> return 0;
> }
>
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h
> index 4617d45..11bc8fa 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h
> @@ -644,9 +644,6 @@ typedef int (*ubifs_lpt_scan_callback)(struct ubifs_info *c,
> * @io_mutex: serializes write-buffer I/O
> * @lock: serializes @buf, @lnum, @offs, @avail, @used, @next_ino and @inodes
> * fields
> - * @softlimit: soft write-buffer timeout interval
> - * @delta: hard and soft timeouts delta (the timer expire interval is @softlimit
> - * and @softlimit + @delta)
> * @timer: write-buffer timer
> * @no_timer: non-zero if this write-buffer does not have a timer
> * @need_sync: non-zero if the timer expired and the wbuf needs sync'ing
> @@ -675,8 +672,6 @@ struct ubifs_wbuf {
> int (*sync_callback)(struct ubifs_info *c, int lnum, int free, int pad);
> struct mutex io_mutex;
> spinlock_t lock;
> - ktime_t softlimit;
> - unsigned long long delta;
> struct hrtimer timer;
> unsigned int no_timer:1;
> unsigned int need_sync:1;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-14 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-14 10:24 [PATCH 1/2] ubifs: drop softlimit and delta fields from struct ubifs_wbuf Rafał Miłecki
2016-09-14 10:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] ubifs: use dirty_writeback_interval value for wbuf timer Rafał Miłecki
2016-09-14 15:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-09-14 15:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] ubifs: drop softlimit and delta fields from struct ubifs_wbuf Boris Brezillon
2016-09-14 15:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-09-14 15:40 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160914174010.3838e142@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).