linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	"Boris Brezillon" <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: [PATCH V2 1/2] ubifs: drop softlimit and delta fields from struct ubifs_wbuf
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:36:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160920083615.31099-1-zajec5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160914102151.21722-1-zajec5@gmail.com>

From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>

Values of these fields are set during init and never modified. They are
used (read) in a single function only. There isn't really any reason to
keep them in a struct. It only makes struct just a bit bigger without
any visible gain.

Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
---
 fs/ubifs/io.c    | 18 ++++++++++--------
 fs/ubifs/ubifs.h |  5 -----
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/io.c b/fs/ubifs/io.c
index 97be412..4d6ce4a 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/io.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/io.c
@@ -452,16 +452,22 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart wbuf_timer_callback_nolock(struct hrtimer *timer)
  */
 static void new_wbuf_timer_nolock(struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf)
 {
+	ktime_t softlimit = ktime_set(WBUF_TIMEOUT_SOFTLIMIT, 0);
+	unsigned long long delta;
+
+	delta = WBUF_TIMEOUT_HARDLIMIT - WBUF_TIMEOUT_SOFTLIMIT;
+	delta *= 1000000000ULL;
+
 	ubifs_assert(!hrtimer_active(&wbuf->timer));
+	ubifs_assert(delta <= ULONG_MAX);
 
 	if (wbuf->no_timer)
 		return;
 	dbg_io("set timer for jhead %s, %llu-%llu millisecs",
 	       dbg_jhead(wbuf->jhead),
-	       div_u64(ktime_to_ns(wbuf->softlimit), USEC_PER_SEC),
-	       div_u64(ktime_to_ns(wbuf->softlimit) + wbuf->delta,
-		       USEC_PER_SEC));
-	hrtimer_start_range_ns(&wbuf->timer, wbuf->softlimit, wbuf->delta,
+	       div_u64(ktime_to_ns(softlimit), USEC_PER_SEC),
+	       div_u64(ktime_to_ns(softlimit) + delta, USEC_PER_SEC));
+	hrtimer_start_range_ns(&wbuf->timer, softlimit, delta,
 			       HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
 }
 
@@ -1059,10 +1065,6 @@ int ubifs_wbuf_init(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_wbuf *wbuf)
 
 	hrtimer_init(&wbuf->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
 	wbuf->timer.function = wbuf_timer_callback_nolock;
-	wbuf->softlimit = ktime_set(WBUF_TIMEOUT_SOFTLIMIT, 0);
-	wbuf->delta = WBUF_TIMEOUT_HARDLIMIT - WBUF_TIMEOUT_SOFTLIMIT;
-	wbuf->delta *= 1000000000ULL;
-	ubifs_assert(wbuf->delta <= ULONG_MAX);
 	return 0;
 }
 
diff --git a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h
index 4617d45..11bc8fa 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h
+++ b/fs/ubifs/ubifs.h
@@ -644,9 +644,6 @@ typedef int (*ubifs_lpt_scan_callback)(struct ubifs_info *c,
  * @io_mutex: serializes write-buffer I/O
  * @lock: serializes @buf, @lnum, @offs, @avail, @used, @next_ino and @inodes
  *        fields
- * @softlimit: soft write-buffer timeout interval
- * @delta: hard and soft timeouts delta (the timer expire interval is @softlimit
- *         and @softlimit + @delta)
  * @timer: write-buffer timer
  * @no_timer: non-zero if this write-buffer does not have a timer
  * @need_sync: non-zero if the timer expired and the wbuf needs sync'ing
@@ -675,8 +672,6 @@ struct ubifs_wbuf {
 	int (*sync_callback)(struct ubifs_info *c, int lnum, int free, int pad);
 	struct mutex io_mutex;
 	spinlock_t lock;
-	ktime_t softlimit;
-	unsigned long long delta;
 	struct hrtimer timer;
 	unsigned int no_timer:1;
 	unsigned int need_sync:1;
-- 
2.9.3

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-20  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-14 10:21 [PATCH 0/2] ubifs: respect dirty_writeback_interval Rafał Miłecki
2016-09-16 13:53 ` Richard Weinberger
2016-09-16 14:43   ` Rafał Miłecki
2016-09-20  8:36 ` Rafał Miłecki [this message]
2016-09-20  8:36   ` [PATCH V2 2/2] ubifs: use dirty_writeback_interval value for wbuf timer Rafał Miłecki
2016-09-20  8:40     ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-11 21:48   ` [PATCH V2 1/2] ubifs: drop softlimit and delta fields from struct ubifs_wbuf Rafał Miłecki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160920083615.31099-1-zajec5@gmail.com \
    --to=zajec5@gmail.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).