From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@ni.com>
Cc: <dwmw2@infradead.org>, <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
<richard@nod.at>, <dedekind1@gmail.com>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] mtd: use ONFI bad blocks per LUN to calculate UBI bad PEB limit
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 21:56:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161027215653.6f97858d@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1477595642-11454-1-git-send-email-zach.brown@ni.com>
Hi Zach,
Please do not resend after only one week. Reviewing this series was on
my TODO list ;).
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 14:13:59 -0500
Zach Brown <zach.brown@ni.com> wrote:
> For ONFI-compliant NAND devices, the ONFI parameters report the maximum number
> of bad blocks per LUN that will be encountered over the lifetime of the device,
> so we can use that information to get a more accurate (and smaller) value for
> the UBI bad PEB limit.
>
> The ONFI parameter "maxiumum number of bad blocks per LUN" is the max number of
> bad blocks that each individual LUN will ever ecounter. It is not the number of
> bad blocks to reserve for the nand device per LUN in the device.
>
> This means that in the worst case a UBI device spanning X LUNs will encounter
> "maximum number of bad blocks per LUN" * X bad blocks. The implementation in
> this patch assumes this worst case and allocates bad block accordingly.
That's a discussion I had with Richard a few months ago, and I didn't
know someone had already proposed a patch for that. So that's all good
news.
Indeed, I really think we should use information retrieved at flash
detection time rather than asking the user to explicitly tweak the
bad_peb_limit value for its chip.
>
> These patches are ordered in terms of their dependencies, but ideally, all 3
> would need to be applied for this to work as intended.
>
> v1:
> * Changed commit message to address concerns from v1[1] about this patch set
> making best case assumptions.
>
> [1]
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1505.1/04822.html
>
> Jeff Westfahl (3):
> mtd: introduce function max_bad_blocks
> mtd: nand: implement 'max_bad_blocks' mtd function
> mtd: ubi: use 'max_bad_blocks' to compute bad_peb_limit if available
>
> drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c | 9 +++++++++
> include/linux/mtd/mtd.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 56 insertions(+)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-27 19:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-27 19:13 [RESEND PATCH v2 0/3] mtd: use ONFI bad blocks per LUN to calculate UBI bad PEB limit Zach Brown
2016-10-27 19:14 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 1/3] mtd: introduce function max_bad_blocks Zach Brown
2016-10-27 20:01 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-27 19:14 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 2/3] mtd: nand: implement 'max_bad_blocks' mtd function Zach Brown
2016-10-27 20:04 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-27 19:14 ` [RESEND PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: ubi: use 'max_bad_blocks' to compute bad_peb_limit if available Zach Brown
2016-10-27 20:05 ` Boris Brezillon
2016-10-27 19:56 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161027215653.6f97858d@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=zach.brown@ni.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).