linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Zach Brown <zach.brown@ni.com>
Cc: <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	dedekind1@gmail.com, richard@nod.at,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	computersforpeace@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/5] mtd: use ONFI bad blocks per LUN to calculate UBI bad PEB limit
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 10:37:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161122103706.5b40b27a@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1479757899-6849-1-git-send-email-zach.brown@ni.com>

Hi Zach,

Please do not resend a patch series so quickly (a simple ping is
enough).
BTW, I already asked Richard and Brian to have a look, let's wait a bit.

On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:51:34 -0600
Zach Brown <zach.brown@ni.com> wrote:

> For ONFI-compliant NAND devices, the ONFI parameters report the maximum number
> of bad blocks per LUN that will be encountered over the lifetime of the device,
> so we can use that information to get a more accurate (and smaller) value for
> the UBI bad PEB limit.
> 
> The ONFI parameter "maxiumum number of bad blocks per LUN" is the max number of
> bad blocks that each individual LUN will ever ecounter. It is not the number of
> bad blocks to reserve for the nand device per LUN in the device.
> 
> This means that in the worst case a UBI device spanning X LUNs will encounter
> "maximum number of bad blocks per LUN" * X bad blocks. The implementation in
> this patch assumes this worst case and allocates bad block accordingly.
> 
> These patches are ordered in terms of their dependencies, but ideally, all 5
> would need to be applied for this to work as intended.
> 
> v2:
>  * Changed commit message to address concerns from v1[1] about this patch set
>    making best case assumptions.
> v3:
>  * Provided helper function for _max_bad_blocks
>  * Two new patches
>  * First new patch adds bb_per_lun and blocks_per_lun to nand_chip struct
>  * Second new patch sets the new fields during nand_flash_detect_onfi
>  * Max bad blocks calculation now uses the new nand_chip fields
> v4:
>  * Changed bb_per_lun and blocks_per_lun to bb_per_die and blocks_per_die
>  * Corrected type of bb_per_die and blocks_per_die from little endian to host
>    unsigned int
> v5:
>  * Changed bb_per_die to max_bb_per_die
>  * Fixed spacing style issue
> 
> [1]
> http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1505.1/04822.html
> 
> Jeff Westfahl (2):
>   mtd: introduce function max_bad_blocks
>   mtd: ubi: use 'max_bad_blocks' to compute bad_peb_limit if available
> 
> Zach Brown (3):
>   mtd: nand: Add max_bb_per_die and blocks_per_die fields to nand_chip
>   mtd: nand: implement 'max_bad_blocks' mtd function
>   mtd: nand: set max_bb_per_die and blocks_per_die for ONFI compliant
>     chips
> 
>  drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c        | 12 ++++++++++++
>  drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/mtd/ubi/build.c      |  4 ++++
>  include/linux/mtd/mtd.h      | 11 +++++++++++
>  include/linux/mtd/nand.h     |  5 +++++
>  5 files changed, 70 insertions(+)
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-11-22  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-11-21 19:51 [RESEND PATCH v5 0/5] mtd: use ONFI bad blocks per LUN to calculate UBI bad PEB limit Zach Brown
2016-11-21 19:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 1/5] mtd: introduce function max_bad_blocks Zach Brown
2016-11-22 18:48   ` Brian Norris
2016-11-21 19:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 2/5] mtd: ubi: use 'max_bad_blocks' to compute bad_peb_limit if available Zach Brown
2016-11-22 18:42   ` Brian Norris
2016-11-25 13:37     ` Richard Weinberger
2016-11-25 14:03       ` Richard Weinberger
2016-11-22 18:50   ` Brian Norris
2016-11-21 19:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 3/5] mtd: nand: Add max_bb_per_die and blocks_per_die fields to nand_chip Zach Brown
2016-11-21 19:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 4/5] mtd: nand: implement 'max_bad_blocks' mtd function Zach Brown
2016-11-22 18:55   ` Brian Norris
2016-11-21 19:51 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 5/5] mtd: nand: set max_bb_per_die and blocks_per_die for ONFI compliant chips Zach Brown
2016-11-22  9:37 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2016-11-22  9:53   ` [RESEND PATCH v5 0/5] mtd: use ONFI bad blocks per LUN to calculate UBI bad PEB limit Richard Weinberger
2016-11-22 18:58 ` Brian Norris

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161122103706.5b40b27a@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=zach.brown@ni.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).