From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com)
	by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 16iJMc-00027F-00
	for <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>; Tue, 05 Mar 2002 18:08:38 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203051017480.15504-100000@rangers.comdev.cc> 
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0203051017480.15504-100000@rangers.comdev.cc> 
To: Adam Wozniak <awozniak@comdev.cc>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, jffs-dev@axis.com
Subject: Re: MTD CVS update: 'mtd/fs/jffs2 gc.c' 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2002 18:19:56 +0000
Message-ID: <2017.1015352396@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org
Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>

awozniak@comdev.cc said:
> I don't understand.  Why does it need a BK repository?  Is CVS not
> sufficient? Will these diverge, or is this just an alternate way to
> get at the same stuff? 

Just an alternative way to get at it. Just playing with BK to see how 
useful it is, to be honest. I'm not going to stop maintaining the CVS tree 
in the foreseeable future.

--
dwmw2