From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 10:05:42 +0100 From: Boris Brezillon To: Alison Wang Cc: Marek Vasut , Alison Wang , "cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "dwmw2@infradead.org" , "computersforpeace@gmail.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: nand: Update dependency of IFC for LS1021A Message-ID: <20170206100542.65f19dc5@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: References: <1483411266-45875-1-git-send-email-b18965@freescale.com> <1483411266-45875-2-git-send-email-b18965@freescale.com> <4e04eb5e-fb53-f71e-ee49-0872a6c11e97@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi Alison, On Thu, 5 Jan 2017 02:02:30 +0000 Alison Wang wrote: > > On 01/04/2017 02:46 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > > >> On 01/03/2017 03:41 AM, Alison Wang wrote: > > >>> As NAND support for Freescale/NXP IFC controller is available on > > >>> LS1021A, the dependency for LS1021A is added. > > >> > > >> Does LS stand for LayerScape ? Yes it does. So why does > > >> ARCH_LAYERSCAPE not cover LS1021 ? > > > [Alison Wang] LS1021A is an earlier product and is not compatible > > with later Layerscape architecture. So ARCH_LAYERSCAPE can't cover > > LS1021A. > > > > Ah ok, I see. That information would be useful in the commit message ;-) > > > [Alison Wang] Ok. :) Would you mind sending a v3 with the updated commit message? Thanks, Boris