Linux-mtd Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>,
	Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] spi-nor: provide a range for poll_timout
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 22:59:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170212225923.55d5f220@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1486917777-23479-1-git-send-email-der.herr@hofr.at>

+Mika

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 17:42:57 +0100
Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at> wrote:

> The overall poll time here is INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000 which is 
> 5000 * 1000 - so 5seconds and it is coded as a tight loop here delay_us
> to readl_poll_timeout() is set to 0. As this is never called in an atomic
> context sleeping should be no issue and there is no reasons for the
> tight-loop here.

Hm, let's wait for Mika's feedback on this one. BTW, can you please Cc
him on you other spi-nor/intel patches and prefix your patches with the
driver name ('mtd: spi-nor: intel: ') so that we know where the changes
are made (without this prefix it looks like you're touching core files)?

Thanks,

Boris

> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <der.herr@hofr.at>
> ---
> 
> Problem located by experimental coccinelle script:
> ./drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c:265:8-26: WARNING: usleep_range min=0 for delay INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000
> ./drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c:274:8-26: WARNING: usleep_range min=0 for delay INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000
> 
> The rational for setting the delay_us here to 40 is that readx_poll_timeout()
> will take delay_us >> 2 + 1 as min value and that should be at least 10us (see
> Documentation/timers/timers-howto.txt). Ideally the delay would be made
> even larger to keep the load on the hrtimer subsystem low as these delays
> here do not seem to be critical. Someone that knows the details of this device
> would need to check if a larger delay would be ok here.
> 
> Patch was compile tested with: multi_v7_defconfig (implies CONFIG_MTD_SPI_NOR=y)
> one coccicheck finding reported and one spars finding (in separate patches)
> 
> Patch is against 4.10-rc6 (localversion-next is next-20170210)
> 
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c
> index a10f602..371bcf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/intel-spi.c
> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ static int intel_spi_wait_hw_busy(struct intel_spi *ispi)
>  	u32 val;
>  
>  	return readl_poll_timeout(ispi->base + HSFSTS_CTL, val,
> -				  !(val & HSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 0,
> +				  !(val & HSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 40,
>  				  INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000);
>  }
>  
> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static int intel_spi_wait_sw_busy(struct intel_spi *ispi)
>  	u32 val;
>  
>  	return readl_poll_timeout(ispi->sregs + SSFSTS_CTL, val,
> -				  !(val & SSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 0,
> +				  !(val & SSFSTS_CTL_SCIP), 40,
>  				  INTEL_SPI_TIMEOUT * 1000);
>  }
>  

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-12 21:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-12 16:42 [PATCH RFC] spi-nor: provide a range for poll_timout Nicholas Mc Guire
2017-02-12 21:59 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-02-13  7:39   ` Nicholas Mc Guire

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170212225923.55d5f220@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com \
    --cc=der.herr@hofr.at \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox