From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 19:34:41 +0100 From: Boris Brezillon To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Richard Weinberger , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , Haavard Skinnemoen , Hans-Christian Egtvedt , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Wenyou Yang , Josh Wu , David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , Cyrille Pitchen , linux-arm-kernel , Rob Herring , Pawel Moll , Mark Rutland , Ian Campbell , Kumar Gala , devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mtd: nand: Remove unused chip->write_page() hook Message-ID: <20170307193441.0c6fd555@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: References: <1487593718-20752-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1487593718-20752-4-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 21:04:50 +0900 Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi Boris, > > 2017-02-20 21:28 GMT+09:00 Boris Brezillon : > > The last/only user of the chip->write_page() hook (the Atmel NAND > > controller driver) has been reworked and is no longer specifying a custom > > ->write_page() implementation. > > Drop this hook before someone else start abusing it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon > > > Just a minor comment. > > > /** > * nand_write_page - [REPLACEABLE] write one page > * @mtd: MTD device structure > > > Can you update the comment block for nand_write_page(), too? > > [REPLACEABLE] -> [INTERNAL] I think I'll just drop it, it does not mean anything to flag a static function as replaceable (the ->write_page() method could be overloaded, but not the nand_write_page() implementation itself).