From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Enrico Jorns <ejo@pengutronix.de>,
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Graham Moore <grmoore@opensource.altera.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Chuanxiao Dong <chuanxiao.dong@intel.com>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 18/37] mtd: nand: denali: do not propagate NAND_STATUS_FAIL to waitfunc()
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:17:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170330171701.7c7d0ee2@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490856383-31560-19-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:46:04 +0900
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
> Currently, the error handling of denali_write_page(_raw) is a bit
> complicated. If the program command fails, NAND_STATUS_FAIL is set
> to the driver internal denali->status, then read out later by
> denali_waitfunc().
>
> We can avoid it by exploiting the nand_write_page() implementation.
> If chip->ecc.write_page(_raw) returns negative code (i.e. -EIO), it
> errors out immediately. This gives the same result as returning
> NAND_STATUS_FAIL from chip->waitfunc. In either way, -EIO is
> returned to the upper MTD layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3: None
> Changes in v2:
> - Newly added
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c | 12 ++++--------
> drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c
> index 79851ca..5da8156 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.c
> @@ -1005,6 +1005,7 @@ static int write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> size_t size = mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize;
> uint32_t irq_status;
> uint32_t irq_mask = INTR__DMA_CMD_COMP | INTR__PROGRAM_FAIL;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> denali->page = page;
>
> @@ -1038,13 +1039,13 @@ static int write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
> if (irq_status == 0) {
> dev_err(denali->dev, "timeout on write_page (type = %d)\n",
> raw_xfer);
> - denali->status = NAND_STATUS_FAIL;
> + ret = -EIO;
> }
>
> denali_enable_dma(denali, false);
> dma_sync_single_for_cpu(denali->dev, addr, size, DMA_TO_DEVICE);
>
> - return 0;
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /* NAND core entry points */
> @@ -1196,12 +1197,7 @@ static void denali_select_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd, int chip)
>
> static int denali_waitfunc(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip)
> {
> - struct denali_nand_info *denali = mtd_to_denali(mtd);
> - int status = denali->status;
> -
> - denali->status = 0;
> -
> - return status;
> + return 0;
I know it's not your fault, and the existing denali_waitfunc() is
already buggy, but it's definitely wrong to return 0 here without
checking the NAND status.
->waitfunc() is not only used to wait for a page-program operation,
it's used every time the NAND enters the busy state (lock, unlock,
set_features, ...).
Anyway, I'll review the remaining patches before taking a decision.
> }
>
> static int denali_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, int page)
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h
> index 00ce04e..9e2b787 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/denali.h
> @@ -329,7 +329,6 @@ struct nand_buf {
> struct denali_nand_info {
> struct nand_chip nand;
> int flash_bank; /* currently selected chip */
> - int status;
> int platform;
> struct nand_buf buf;
> struct device *dev;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-30 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-30 6:45 [PATCH v3 00/37] mtd: nand: denali: 2nd round of Denali NAND IP patch bomb Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 01/37] mtd: nand: relax ecc.read_page() return value for uncorrectable ECC Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 02/37] mtd: nand: denali: allow to override mtd->name from label DT property Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 03/37] mtd: nand: denali: remove meaningless pipeline read-ahead operation Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 04/37] mtd: nand: denali: fix bitflips calculation in handle_ecc() Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 05/37] mtd: nand: denali: fix erased page checking Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 06/37] mtd: nand: denali: support HW_ECC_FIXUP capability Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 07/37] mtd: nand: denali_dt: enable HW_ECC_FIXUP for Altera SOCFPGA variant Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 08/37] mtd: nand: denali: support 64bit capable DMA engine Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 09/37] mtd: nand: denali_dt: remove dma-mask DT property Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 10/37] mtd: nand: denali_dt: use pdev instead of ofdev for platform_device Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 11/37] mtd: nand: denali: allow to override revision number Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 12/37] mtd: nand: denali: support 1024 byte ECC step size Masahiro Yamada
2017-04-01 8:43 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:45 ` [PATCH v3 13/37] mtd: nand: denali: avoid hard-coding ecc.strength and ecc.bytes Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-31 9:09 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 14/37] mtd: nand: denali: support "nand-ecc-strength" DT property Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 14:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-03-31 5:06 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-31 9:46 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-03 3:16 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-04-09 16:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-11 6:19 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-04-11 7:56 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-14 7:57 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-04-14 8:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-22 15:00 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 15/37] mtd: nand: denali: remove Toshiba and Hynix specific fixup code Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 16/37] mtd: nand: denali_dt: add compatible strings for UniPhier SoC variants Masahiro Yamada
2017-04-03 15:46 ` Rob Herring
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 17/37] mtd: nand: denali: set NAND_ECC_CUSTOM_PAGE_ACCESS Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 18/37] mtd: nand: denali: do not propagate NAND_STATUS_FAIL to waitfunc() Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 15:17 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 19/37] mtd: nand: denali: use BIT() and GENMASK() for register macros Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 20/37] mtd: nand: denali: remove unneeded find_valid_banks() Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 21/37] mtd: nand: denali: handle timing parameters by setup_data_interface() Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 22/37] mtd: nand: denali: rework interrupt handling Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 23/37] mtd: nand: denali: fix NAND_CMD_STATUS handling Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 24/37] mtd: nand: denali: fix NAND_CMD_PARAM handling Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 25/37] mtd: nand: denali: switch over to cmd_ctrl instead of cmdfunc Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 15:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 26/37] mtd: nand: denali: fix bank reset function Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 16:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-03 7:05 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 27/37] mtd: nand: denali: use interrupt instead of polling for bank reset Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 28/37] mtd: nand: denali: propagate page to helpers via function argument Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 29/37] mtd: nand: denali: merge struct nand_buf into struct denali_nand_info Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 6:46 ` [PATCH v3 30/37] mtd: nand: denali: use flag instead of register macro for direction Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 16:38 ` [PATCH v3 00/37] mtd: nand: denali: 2nd round of Denali NAND IP patch bomb Boris Brezillon
2017-03-31 4:05 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-31 8:27 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170330171701.7c7d0ee2@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chuanxiao.dong@intel.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ejo@pengutronix.de \
--cc=grmoore@opensource.altera.com \
--cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox