From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org>,
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>,
Graham Moore <grmoore@opensource.altera.com>,
Enrico Jorns <ejo@pengutronix.de>,
Chuanxiao Dong <chuanxiao.dong@intel.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Jassi Brar <jaswinder.singh@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 33/37] mtd: nand: allocate aligned buffers if NAND_OWN_BUFFERS is unset
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 16:17:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170409161717.0f59bc9d@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1490861708-27813-3-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 17:15:04 +0900
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote:
> Some NAND controllers are using DMA engine requiring a specific
> buffer alignment. The core provides no guarantee on the nand_buffers
> pointers, which forces some drivers to allocate their own buffers
> and pass the NAND_OWN_BUFFERS flag.
>
> Rework the nand_buffers allocation logic to allocate each buffer
> independently. This should make most NAND controllers/DMA engine
> happy, and allow us to get rid of these custom buf allocation in
> NAND controller drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Reword git-log
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Newly added
>
> drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> index f828ad7..e9d3195 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
> @@ -4613,13 +4613,25 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> }
>
> if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS)) {
> - nbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*nbuf) + mtd->writesize
> - + mtd->oobsize * 3, GFP_KERNEL);
> + nbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*nbuf), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!nbuf)
> return -ENOMEM;
> - nbuf->ecccalc = (uint8_t *)(nbuf + 1);
> - nbuf->ecccode = nbuf->ecccalc + mtd->oobsize;
> - nbuf->databuf = nbuf->ecccode + mtd->oobsize;
> + nbuf->ecccalc = kmalloc(mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!nbuf->ecccalc) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto err_free;
You have a memory leak here, because chip->buffers = nbuf is only done
after all allocations have succeeded.
> + }
> + nbuf->ecccode = kmalloc(mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!nbuf->ecccode) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
ret = -ENOMEM;
I have the following fixup patch, let me know if you're okay with it
and I'll squash it in the original commit.
Thanks,
Boris
--->8---
From 7903e4c997da101bc0f15016936116c4bb9db78c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 16:14:36 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fixup! mtd: nand: allocate aligned buffers if
NAND_OWN_BUFFERS is unset
---
drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
index 23a415d1f124..ed49a1d634b0 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/nand_base.c
@@ -4501,7 +4501,7 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
{
struct nand_chip *chip = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
struct nand_ecc_ctrl *ecc = &chip->ecc;
- struct nand_buffers *nbuf;
+ struct nand_buffers *nbuf = NULL;
int ret;
/* New bad blocks should be marked in OOB, flash-based BBT, or both */
@@ -4518,20 +4518,23 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
nbuf = kzalloc(sizeof(*nbuf), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!nbuf)
return -ENOMEM;
+
nbuf->ecccalc = kmalloc(mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!nbuf->ecccalc) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err_free;
}
+
nbuf->ecccode = kmalloc(mtd->oobsize, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!nbuf->ecccode) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err_free;
}
+
nbuf->databuf = kmalloc(mtd->writesize + mtd->oobsize,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!nbuf->databuf) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err_free;
}
@@ -4773,11 +4776,11 @@ int nand_scan_tail(struct mtd_info *mtd)
/* Build bad block table */
return chip->scan_bbt(mtd);
err_free:
- if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS)) {
- kfree(chip->buffers->databuf);
- kfree(chip->buffers->ecccode);
- kfree(chip->buffers->ecccalc);
- kfree(chip->buffers);
+ if (nbuf) {
+ kfree(nbuf->databuf);
+ kfree(nbuf->ecccode);
+ kfree(nbuf->ecccalc);
+ kfree(nbuf);
}
return ret;
}
@@ -4829,7 +4832,7 @@ void nand_cleanup(struct nand_chip *chip)
/* Free bad block table memory */
kfree(chip->bbt);
- if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS)) {
+ if (!(chip->options & NAND_OWN_BUFFERS) && chip->buffers) {
kfree(chip->buffers->databuf);
kfree(chip->buffers->ecccode);
kfree(chip->buffers->ecccalc);
--
2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-09 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-30 8:15 [PATCH v3 31/37] mtd: nand: denali: fix raw and oob accessors for syndrome page layout Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 8:15 ` [PATCH v3 32/37] mtd: nand: denali: support hardware-assisted erased page detection Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 16:30 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-06-06 2:04 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 8:15 ` [PATCH v3 33/37] mtd: nand: allocate aligned buffers if NAND_OWN_BUFFERS is unset Masahiro Yamada
2017-04-06 14:08 ` Leonard Crestez
2017-04-07 6:49 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-04-09 7:33 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-09 14:17 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-04-10 0:20 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 8:15 ` [PATCH v3 34/37] mtd: nand: allow drivers to request minimum alignment for passed buffer Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-31 4:01 ` Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 8:15 ` [PATCH v3 35/37] mtd: nand: denali: skip driver internal bounce buffer when possible Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 8:15 ` [PATCH v3 36/37] mtd: nand: denali: use non-managed kmalloc() for DMA buffer Masahiro Yamada
2017-03-30 8:15 ` [PATCH v3 37/37] mtd: nand: denali: enable bad block table scan Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170409161717.0f59bc9d@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chuanxiao.dong@intel.com \
--cc=dinguyen@kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=ejo@pengutronix.de \
--cc=grmoore@opensource.altera.com \
--cc=jaswinder.singh@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox