From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Peter Pan <peterpandong@micron.com>
Cc: <richard@nod.at>, <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
<arnaud.mouiche@gmail.com>, <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
<marex@denx.de>, <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>,
<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, <peterpansjtu@gmail.com>,
<linshunquan1@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] nand: spi: add basic blocks for infrastructure
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 22:34:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170417223404.195a0812@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1491810713-27795-2-git-send-email-peterpandong@micron.com>
On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 15:51:48 +0800
Peter Pan <peterpandong@micron.com> wrote:
> +/*
> + * spinand_dt_init - Initialize SPI NAND by device tree node
> + * @chip: SPI NAND device structure
> + *
> + * TODO: put ecc_mode, ecc_strength, ecc_step, bbt, etc in here
> + * and move it in generic NAND core.
> + */
> +static void spinand_dt_init(struct spinand_device *chip)
> +{
> +}
Please drop this function until you really have something to put in
there.
> +
> +/*
> + * spinand_detect - detect the SPI NAND device
> + * @chip: SPI NAND device structure
> + */
> +static int spinand_detect(struct spinand_device *chip)
> +{
> + struct nand_device *nand = &chip->base;
> + int ret;
> +
> + spinand_reset(chip);
> + spinand_read_id(chip, chip->id.data);
> + chip->id.len = SPINAND_MAX_ID_LEN;
> +
> + ret = spinand_manufacturer_detect(chip);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(chip->dev, "unknown raw ID %*phN\n",
> + SPINAND_MAX_ID_LEN, chip->id.data);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + dev_info(chip->dev, "%s (%s) is found.\n", chip->name,
> + chip->manufacturer.manu->name);
> + dev_info(chip->dev,
> + "%d MiB, block size: %d KiB, page size: %d, OOB size: %d\n",
> + (int)(nand_size(nand) >> 20), nand_eraseblock_size(nand) >> 10,
> + nand_page_size(nand), nand_per_page_oobsize(nand));
> +
> +out:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * spinand_init - initialize the SPI NAND device
> + * @chip: SPI NAND device structure
> + */
> +static int spinand_init(struct spinand_device *chip)
> +{
> + struct mtd_info *mtd = spinand_to_mtd(chip);
> + struct nand_device *nand = mtd_to_nand(mtd);
> + struct spinand_ecc_engine *ecc_engine;
> + int ret;
> +
> + spinand_dt_init(chip);
> + spinand_set_rd_wr_op(chip);
> +
> + chip->buf = devm_kzalloc(chip->dev,
> + nand_page_size(nand) +
> + nand_per_page_oobsize(nand),
> + GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!chip->buf) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto err;
> + }
> +
> + chip->oobbuf = chip->buf + nand_page_size(nand);
> +
> + spinand_manufacturer_init(chip);
> +
> + mtd->name = chip->name;
> + mtd->size = nand_size(nand);
> + mtd->erasesize = nand_eraseblock_size(nand);
> + mtd->writesize = nand_page_size(nand);
> + mtd->writebufsize = mtd->writesize;
> + mtd->owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + mtd->type = MTD_NANDFLASH;
> + mtd->flags = MTD_CAP_NANDFLASH;
> + if (!mtd->ecc_strength)
> + mtd->ecc_strength = ecc_engine->strength ?
> + ecc_engine->strength : 1;
Why 1 if the engine strength is 0?
> +
> + mtd->oobsize = nand_per_page_oobsize(nand);
> + ret = mtd_ooblayout_count_freebytes(mtd);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + ret = 0;
> + mtd->oobavail = ret;
> +
> + if (!mtd->bitflip_threshold)
> + mtd->bitflip_threshold = DIV_ROUND_UP(mtd->ecc_strength * 3,
> + 4);
> + /* After power up, all blocks are locked, so unlock it here. */
> + spinand_lock_block(chip, BL_ALL_UNLOCKED);
> +
> + return nand_register(nand);
> +
> +err:
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
[...]
> diff --git a/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h b/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..78ea9a6
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/mtd/spinand.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,257 @@
[...]
> +
> +struct spinand_controller_ops {
> + int (*exec_op)(struct spinand_device *chip,
> + struct spinand_op *op);
> +};
> +
> +struct spinand_manufacturer_ops {
> + /*
> + * Firstly, ->detect() should not be NULL.
> + * ->detect() implementation for manufacturer A never sends
> + * any manufacturer specific SPI command to a SPI NAND from
> + * manufacturer B, so the proper way is to decode the raw id
> + * data in chip->id.data first, if manufacture ID dismatch,
> + * return directly and let others to detect.
> + */
> + bool (*detect)(struct spinand_device *chip);
> + int (*init)(struct spinand_device *chip);
> + void (*cleanup)(struct spinand_device *chip);
> +};
> +
> +struct spinand_manufacturer {
> + u8 id;
> + char *name;
> + const struct spinand_manufacturer_ops *ops;
> +};
> +
> +struct spinand_ecc_engine_ops {
> + void (*get_ecc_status)(struct spinand_device *chip,
> + unsigned int status, unsigned int *corrected,
> + unsigned int *ecc_errors);
> + void (*disable_ecc)(struct spinand_device *chip);
> + void (*enable_ecc)(struct spinand_device *chip);
> +};
> +
> +enum spinand_ecc_type {
> + SPINAND_ECC_ONDIE,
> + SPINAND_ECC_HW,
> +};
> +
> +struct spinand_ecc_engine {
> + u32 strength;
> + u32 steps;
> + const struct spinand_ecc_engine_ops *ops;
> +};
> +
> +#define SPINAND_CAP_RD_X1 BIT(0)
> +#define SPINAND_CAP_RD_X2 BIT(1)
> +#define SPINAND_CAP_RD_X4 BIT(2)
> +#define SPINAND_CAP_RD_DUAL BIT(3)
> +#define SPINAND_CAP_RD_QUAD BIT(4)
> +#define SPINAND_CAP_WR_X1 BIT(5)
> +#define SPINAND_CAP_WR_X2 BIT(6)
> +#define SPINAND_CAP_WR_X4 BIT(7)
> +#define SPINAND_CAP_WR_DUAL BIT(8)
> +#define SPINAND_CAP_WR_QUAD BIT(9)
> +#define SPINAND_CAP_HW_ECC BIT(10)
> +
> +struct spinand_controller {
> + struct spinand_controller_ops *ops;
> + u32 caps;
> +};
Can you please document all structures using kernel-doc headers?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-17 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-10 7:51 [PATCH v5 0/6] Introduction to SPI NAND framework Peter Pan
2017-04-10 7:51 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] nand: spi: add basic blocks for infrastructure Peter Pan
2017-04-10 8:28 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-14 13:18 ` Marek Vasut
2017-04-17 20:34 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-04-17 20:53 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-18 7:29 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-10 7:51 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] nand: spi: add basic operations support Peter Pan
2017-04-17 21:05 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-10 7:51 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] nand: spi: Add bad block support Peter Pan
2017-04-17 21:23 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-10 7:51 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] nand: spi: add Micron spi nand support Peter Pan
2017-04-14 13:23 ` Marek Vasut
2017-04-18 7:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-10 7:51 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] nand: spi: Add generic SPI controller support Peter Pan
2017-04-14 13:26 ` Marek Vasut
2017-04-18 7:41 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-18 7:26 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-04-10 7:51 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] MAINTAINERS: Add SPI NAND entry Peter Pan
2017-04-18 7:42 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] Introduction to SPI NAND framework Boris Brezillon
2017-04-19 6:01 ` Peter Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170417223404.195a0812@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=arnaud.mouiche@gmail.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com \
--cc=linshunquan1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=peterpandong@micron.com \
--cc=peterpansjtu@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox