From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Mario Rugiero <mrugiero@gmail.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: add option to erase NAND blocks even if detected as bad.
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 11:34:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170512113414.213f515b@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKKQwLSkv_bVPxYqjUKqasDzZ6PiZdhiksipDbHmgnmVWPYN7Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 12 May 2017 06:26:14 -0300
Mario Rugiero <mrugiero@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2017-05-12 6:19 GMT-03:00 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>:
> > Am 12.05.2017 um 11:15 schrieb Mario Rugiero:
> >> I'll read it carefully later. Is there any rough time estimate for it
> >> to hit mainline?
> >> I'm not expecting a date, but rather something in the lines of
> >> "several weeks, several months, several years".
> >> I think we can do with several months, and we'd be happy to start
> >> local experiments with that timeframe in mind.
> >> Several years might be more than the devices will live, though.
> >
> > Since there is currently no funding it might take much longer.
> GSoC sounds like a viable workaround.
> It'd hahve to wait for next year, though.
> I think I'm elligible, so if I still have access to these boards and
> Boris can mentor me, we could get funding to speed up the development.
> I'd be happy to donate it to have another developer, as I'm already
> kinda being paid for this.
> What do you think of that?
Yep, that's a possibility.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-12 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-12 5:39 [PATCH] mtd: nand: add option to erase NAND blocks even if detected as bad Mario J. Rugiero
2017-05-12 5:52 ` [PATCH v2] " Mario J. Rugiero
2017-05-12 7:39 ` [PATCH v3] " Mario J. Rugiero
2017-05-15 8:21 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-15 9:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-15 9:41 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-15 10:10 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-15 11:05 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-15 13:16 ` Mario Rugiero
2017-05-15 13:20 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-12 8:12 ` [PATCH] " Richard Weinberger
2017-05-12 8:16 ` Mario Rugiero
2017-05-12 8:24 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-12 8:33 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-12 8:44 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-12 8:45 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-12 8:34 ` Mario Rugiero
2017-05-12 8:45 ` Boris Brezillon
[not found] ` <CAKKQwLQueea6G4B-cng9QdpjtRWyBWHw1Mq9ai3DVp31xswANg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-05-12 9:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-12 9:15 ` Mario Rugiero
2017-05-12 9:16 ` Mario Rugiero
2017-05-12 9:32 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-12 9:19 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-12 9:26 ` Mario Rugiero
2017-05-12 9:34 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-05-12 10:06 ` Mario Rugiero
2017-05-12 10:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-05-12 10:23 ` Mario Rugiero
2017-05-12 10:34 ` Mario Rugiero
2017-05-13 9:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-05-15 2:54 ` Mario Rugiero
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170512113414.213f515b@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mrugiero@gmail.com \
--cc=richard.weinberger@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox