From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1dAJav-0004s4-Tq for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 15 May 2017 17:15:43 +0000 Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 11:15:19 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linux Doc Mailing List , Rich Felker , linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Takashi Iwai , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , "Herton R. Krzesinski" , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Cyrille Pitchen , Markus Heiser , Yoshinori Sato , Richard Weinberger , Marek Vasut , sayli karnik , Jani Nikula , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, Silvio Fricke , Brian Norris , David Woodhouse Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Convert more books to ReST Message-ID: <20170515111519.7bbb449b@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20170515140912.100c9cac@bbrezillon> References: <20170515140912.100c9cac@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 15 May 2017 14:09:12 +0200 Boris Brezillon wrote: > > mtd: adjust kernel-docs to avoid Sphinx/kerneldoc warnings > > Not sure how you plan to merge these changes, but if it goes through > a single tree I'll probably need an immutable topic branch, because I > plan to change a few things in nand_base.c nand.h for the next release. docs-next doesn't rebase, so there shouldn't be trouble there. But we could also just separate this patch into two pieces. I suspect we could live with a couple of warnings for a period during the 4.13 merge window without too much pain... jon