linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: "Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)" <peterpandong@micron.com>
Cc: "arnaud.mouiche@gmail.com" <arnaud.mouiche@gmail.com>,
	"richard@nod.at" <richard@nod.at>,
	"computersforpeace@gmail.com" <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	"thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com"
	<thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	"marex@denx.de" <marex@denx.de>,
	"cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr" <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>,
	"linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	"peterpansjtu@gmail.com" <peterpansjtu@gmail.com>,
	"linshunquan1@hisilicon.com" <linshunquan1@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/15] A SPI NAND framework under generic NAND framework
Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 08:20:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170531082001.01d11e3d@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <74cb9a07bd3247fd86002ef97509828f@SIWEX4H.sing.micron.com>

Le Wed, 31 May 2017 01:12:16 +0000,
Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong) <peterpandong@micron.com> a écrit :

> Hi Boris,
>  
> On Thu, May 30, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Boris Brezillon
> <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> > Hi Peter,
> > 
> > On Wed, 24 May 2017 15:06:56 +0800
> > Peter Pan <peterpandong@micron.com> wrote:
> >   
> > > First of all, thank Boris and Marek for your priceless comments
> > > on v5 and thank everyone reviewed and tested on my previous series.
> > > I can never be here without your help. This series comes to v6
> > > and it becomes much better with your help.
> > >
> > > SPI NAND is a new NAND family device with SPI protocol as
> > > its interface. And its command set is totally different
> > > with parallel NAND.
> > >
> > > Our first attempt to SPI NAND was more than 2 years ago[1].
> > > At that time, I didn't make BBT shareable and there were
> > > too many duplicate code with parallel NAND, so that serie
> > > stoped. But the discussion never stops. Now Boris has a plan
> > > to make a generic NAND framework which can be shared with
> > > both parallel and SPI NAND. Now the first step of the
> > > new generic NAND framework is finished. And it is waiting
> > > for a user. After discussion with Boris. We both think it's
> > > time to rebuild SPI NAND framework based on the new NAND
> > > framework and send out for reviewing.
> > >
> > > This series includes two part. The first part (patch 1 to 9)
> > > is a new generic NAND framework from Boris Brezillon, which
> > > is from Biris's nand/generic branch[2]. The second part
> > > (patch 10 to 15) introductes a SPI NAND framework based on
> > > the new generic NAND framework.
> > >
> > > This series only supports basic SPI NAND features and uses
> > > generic spi controller for data transfer. ECC support is removed
> > > since it's not in a good structure and more important, it should
> > > be shared between different NAND devices, which means it should
> > > be in new NAND core. Support different types of ECC and advanced
> > > SPI NAND features is the next step.
> > >
> > > This series is based on nand/next branch and is tested on
> > > Xilinx Zedboard with Micron MT29F2G01ABAGDSF SPI NAND chip.  
> > 
> > As you can see, I started to review this v6, but I don't expect you to
> > send a new version (at least not immediately).
> > 
> > Here is the plan: I'll finish reviewing the series, and while I'm
> > reviewing I'll try to address my own comments. Once the review/changes
> > are done, I'll push a nand/spi branch to the github repo [1] and ask
> > you and Arnaud to review/test the whole thing. If you're happy with
> > my changes (it should only be minor changes to your
> > initial implementation) I'll ask you to send a v7. I'll then wait for
> > 4.13-rc1 to be out and apply everything to my nand/next branch (I
> > expect a few conflicting changes in the nand/mtd area caused by the
> > migration to the new doc format, that's why I'd like to wait one more
> > cycle).
> > 
> > If everything goes well, we should be good for 4.14, and the patches
> > will have spent enough time in linux-next to discover obvious bugs.
> > 
> > Let me know if you have a problem with this approach.  
> 
> You plan is great, I'm OK with it. Looking forward to merge SPI NAND
> to main line :)

I'm still expecting replies to my review(s) to know if the changes I
plan to do are correct ;-).

       reply	other threads:[~2017-05-31  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <74cb9a07bd3247fd86002ef97509828f@SIWEX4H.sing.micron.com>
2017-05-31  6:20 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-05-31  6:34   ` [PATCH v6 00/15] A SPI NAND framework under generic NAND framework Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)
2017-05-24  7:06 Peter Pan
2017-05-29 20:59 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-04 13:32   ` Frieder Schrempf
2017-12-04 14:05     ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-05  1:35       ` Peter Pan 潘栋 (peterpandong)
2017-12-05 12:58         ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-05 13:03           ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-12  9:58             ` Frieder Schrempf
2017-12-13 21:27               ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-14  6:15                 ` Peter Pan
2017-12-14  7:50                   ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-14  8:06                     ` Peter Pan
2017-12-14 14:39                       ` Frieder Schrempf
2017-12-14 14:43                         ` Frieder Schrempf
2017-12-14 15:38                         ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-15  1:08                           ` Peter Pan
2017-12-15  1:21                             ` Peter Pan
2017-12-21 11:48                               ` Frieder Schrempf
2017-12-21 13:01                                 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-21 13:54                                   ` Frieder Schrempf
2017-12-22  0:49                                 ` Peter Pan
2017-12-22  6:37                                   ` Peter Pan
2017-12-22  8:28                                     ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-22 13:51                                     ` Boris Brezillon
2018-01-02  2:51                                       ` Peter Pan
2018-01-03 16:46                                         ` Boris Brezillon
2018-01-04  2:01                                           ` Peter Pan
2018-01-08 22:07                                             ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-15  2:35                     ` Peter Pan
2017-12-15 12:41                       ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170531082001.01d11e3d@bbrezillon \
    --to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=arnaud.mouiche@gmail.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
    --cc=linshunquan1@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=peterpandong@micron.com \
    --cc=peterpansjtu@gmail.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).