From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: "Robert Jarzmik" <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>,
"Kyungmin Park" <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
"Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: Stop directly calling master ->_xxx() hooks from mtdpart code
Date: Sun, 25 Jun 2017 18:36:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170625183622.5417b3b4@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170625160113.11860-1-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Le Sun, 25 Jun 2017 18:01:12 +0200,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> a écrit :
> The MTD layer provides several wrappers around mtd->_xxx() hooks. Call
> these wrappers instead of directly dereferencing the associated ->_xxx()
> pointer.
>
> This change has been motivated by another rework letting the core
> handle the case where ->_read/write_oob() are implemented but not
> ->_read/write(). In this case, we want mtd_read/write() to fall back to
> ->_read/write_oob() when ->_read/write() are NULL. The problem is,
> mtdpart is directly calling the ->_xxx() instead of using the wrappers,
> thus leading to a NULL pointer exception.
>
> Even though we only need to do the change for part_read/write(), going
> through those wrappers for all kind of part -> master operation
> propagation is a good thing, because other wrappers might become
> smarter over time, and the duplicated check overhead (parameters will
> be checked at the partition and master level instead of only at the
> partition level) should be negligible.
Hm, this one is conflicting with Rafal's work on part parsers, but
before I send a v3 rebased on l2-mtd/master I'd like to have feedback
on the changes done here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> - new patch needed to fix a NULL pointer dereference BUG
> ---
> drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> index ea5e5307f667..11486ec6cab0 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c
> @@ -68,8 +68,7 @@ static int part_read(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len,
> int res;
>
> stats = part->master->ecc_stats;
> - res = part->master->_read(part->master, from + part->offset, len,
> - retlen, buf);
> + res = mtd_read(part->master, from + part->offset, len, retlen, buf);
> if (unlikely(mtd_is_eccerr(res)))
> mtd->ecc_stats.failed +=
> part->master->ecc_stats.failed - stats.failed;
> @@ -84,15 +83,15 @@ static int part_point(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len,
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
>
> - return part->master->_point(part->master, from + part->offset, len,
> - retlen, virt, phys);
> + return mtd_point(part->master, from + part->offset, len, retlen, virt,
> + phys);
> }
>
> static int part_unpoint(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from, size_t len)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
>
> - return part->master->_unpoint(part->master, from + part->offset, len);
> + return mtd_unpoint(part->master, from + part->offset, len);
> }
>
> static unsigned long part_get_unmapped_area(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> @@ -103,8 +102,7 @@ static unsigned long part_get_unmapped_area(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
>
> offset += part->offset;
> - return part->master->_get_unmapped_area(part->master, len, offset,
> - flags);
> + return mtd_get_unmapped_area(part->master, len, offset, flags);
> }
>
> static int part_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
> @@ -132,7 +130,7 @@ static int part_read_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - res = part->master->_read_oob(part->master, from + part->offset, ops);
> + res = mtd_read_oob(part->master, from + part->offset, ops);
> if (unlikely(res)) {
> if (mtd_is_bitflip(res))
> mtd->ecc_stats.corrected++;
> @@ -146,48 +144,43 @@ static int part_read_user_prot_reg(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
> size_t len, size_t *retlen, u_char *buf)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - return part->master->_read_user_prot_reg(part->master, from, len,
> - retlen, buf);
> + return mtd_read_user_prot_reg(part->master, from, len, retlen, buf);
> }
>
> static int part_get_user_prot_info(struct mtd_info *mtd, size_t len,
> size_t *retlen, struct otp_info *buf)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - return part->master->_get_user_prot_info(part->master, len, retlen,
> - buf);
> + return mtd_get_user_prot_info(part->master, len, retlen, buf);
> }
>
> static int part_read_fact_prot_reg(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
> size_t len, size_t *retlen, u_char *buf)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - return part->master->_read_fact_prot_reg(part->master, from, len,
> - retlen, buf);
> + return mtd_read_fact_prot_reg(part->master, from, len, retlen, buf);
> }
>
> static int part_get_fact_prot_info(struct mtd_info *mtd, size_t len,
> size_t *retlen, struct otp_info *buf)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - return part->master->_get_fact_prot_info(part->master, len, retlen,
> - buf);
> + return mtd_get_fact_prot_info(part->master, len, retlen, buf);
> }
>
> static int part_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len,
> size_t *retlen, const u_char *buf)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - return part->master->_write(part->master, to + part->offset, len,
> - retlen, buf);
> + return mtd_write(part->master, to + part->offset, len, retlen, buf);
> }
>
> static int part_panic_write(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to, size_t len,
> size_t *retlen, const u_char *buf)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - return part->master->_panic_write(part->master, to + part->offset, len,
> - retlen, buf);
> + return mtd_panic_write(part->master, to + part->offset, len, retlen,
> + buf);
> }
>
> static int part_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to,
> @@ -199,30 +192,29 @@ static int part_write_oob(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t to,
> return -EINVAL;
> if (ops->datbuf && to + ops->len > mtd->size)
> return -EINVAL;
> - return part->master->_write_oob(part->master, to + part->offset, ops);
> + return mtd_write_oob(part->master, to + part->offset, ops);
> }
>
> static int part_write_user_prot_reg(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
> size_t len, size_t *retlen, u_char *buf)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - return part->master->_write_user_prot_reg(part->master, from, len,
> - retlen, buf);
> + return mtd_write_user_prot_reg(part->master, from, len, retlen, buf);
> }
>
> static int part_lock_user_prot_reg(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t from,
> size_t len)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - return part->master->_lock_user_prot_reg(part->master, from, len);
> + return mtd_lock_user_prot_reg(part->master, from, len);
> }
>
> static int part_writev(struct mtd_info *mtd, const struct kvec *vecs,
> unsigned long count, loff_t to, size_t *retlen)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - return part->master->_writev(part->master, vecs, count,
> - to + part->offset, retlen);
> + return mtd_writev(part->master, vecs, count, to + part->offset,
> + retlen);
> }
>
> static int part_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
> @@ -231,7 +223,7 @@ static int part_erase(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct erase_info *instr)
> int ret;
>
> instr->addr += part->offset;
> - ret = part->master->_erase(part->master, instr);
> + ret = mtd_erase(part->master, instr);
> if (ret) {
> if (instr->fail_addr != MTD_FAIL_ADDR_UNKNOWN)
> instr->fail_addr -= part->offset;
> @@ -257,51 +249,51 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mtd_erase_callback);
> static int part_lock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - return part->master->_lock(part->master, ofs + part->offset, len);
> + return mtd_lock(part->master, ofs + part->offset, len);
> }
>
> static int part_unlock(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - return part->master->_unlock(part->master, ofs + part->offset, len);
> + return mtd_unlock(part->master, ofs + part->offset, len);
> }
>
> static int part_is_locked(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, uint64_t len)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - return part->master->_is_locked(part->master, ofs + part->offset, len);
> + return mtd_is_locked(part->master, ofs + part->offset, len);
> }
>
> static void part_sync(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - part->master->_sync(part->master);
> + mtd_sync(part->master);
> }
>
> static int part_suspend(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - return part->master->_suspend(part->master);
> + return mtd_suspend(part->master);
> }
>
> static void part_resume(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - part->master->_resume(part->master);
> + mtd_resume(part->master);
> }
>
> static int part_block_isreserved(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> ofs += part->offset;
> - return part->master->_block_isreserved(part->master, ofs);
> + return mtd_block_isreserved(part->master, ofs);
> }
>
> static int part_block_isbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> ofs += part->offset;
> - return part->master->_block_isbad(part->master, ofs);
> + return mtd_block_isbad(part->master, ofs);
> }
>
> static int part_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
> @@ -310,7 +302,7 @@ static int part_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
> int res;
>
> ofs += part->offset;
> - res = part->master->_block_markbad(part->master, ofs);
> + res = mtd_block_markbad(part->master, ofs);
> if (!res)
> mtd->ecc_stats.badblocks++;
> return res;
> @@ -319,13 +311,13 @@ static int part_block_markbad(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs)
> static int part_get_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - return part->master->_get_device(part->master);
> + return __get_mtd_device(part->master);
> }
>
> static void part_put_device(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
> - part->master->_put_device(part->master);
> + __put_mtd_device(part->master);
> }
>
> static int part_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
> @@ -353,8 +345,7 @@ static int part_max_bad_blocks(struct mtd_info *mtd, loff_t ofs, size_t len)
> {
> struct mtd_part *part = mtd_to_part(mtd);
>
> - return part->master->_max_bad_blocks(part->master,
> - ofs + part->offset, len);
> + return mtd_max_bad_blocks(part->master, ofs + part->offset, len);
> }
>
> static inline void free_partition(struct mtd_part *p)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-25 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-25 16:01 [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: Stop directly calling master ->_xxx() hooks from mtdpart code Boris Brezillon
2017-06-25 16:01 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] mtd: Fallback to ->_read/write_oob() when ->_read/write() is missing Boris Brezillon
2017-06-25 16:36 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-06-27 18:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] mtd: Stop directly calling master ->_xxx() hooks from mtdpart code Brian Norris
2017-06-27 19:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-06-27 19:52 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170625183622.5417b3b4@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=robert.jarzmik@free.fr \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox