From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::232]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1e1ekR-0008Tt-BH for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 20:34:06 +0000 Received: by mail-pf0-x232.google.com with SMTP id 17so6564801pfn.12 for ; Mon, 09 Oct 2017 13:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2017 13:33:33 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Theodore Ts'o , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Eric Biggers Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] fscrypt: add a documentation file for filesystem-level encryption Message-ID: <20171009203333.GC67463@gmail.com> References: <20170909001512.72431-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170909001512.72431-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com> List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 05:15:12PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote: > From: Eric Biggers > > Perhaps long overdue, add a documentation file for filesystem-level > encryption, a.k.a. fscrypt or fs/crypto/, to the Documentation > directory. The new file is based loosely on the latest version of the > "EXT4 Encryption Design Document (public version)" Google Doc, but with > many improvements made, including: > > - Reflect the reality that it is not specific to ext4 anymore. > - More thoroughly document the design and user-visible API/behavior. > - Replace outdated information, such as the outdated explanation of how > encrypted filenames are hashed for indexed directories and how > encrypted filenames are presented to userspace without the key. > (This was changed just before release.) > > For now the focus is on the design and user-visible API/behavior, not on > how to add encryption support to a filesystem --- since the internal API > is still pretty messy and any standalone documentation for it would > become outdated as things get refactored over time. > > Reviewed-by: Michael Halcrow Ted, are you interested in taking this through the fscrypt tree for v4.15? Eric