From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/5] unconfuse get_unmapped_area and point/unpoint driver methods
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 23:26:16 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171011032621.26979-1-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org> (raw)
This is my first MTD contribution after more than 10 years.
Feels like Back to the Future! :-)
This series improves or implements the point and unpoint driver methods
and reimplements mtd_get_unmapped_area() in terms of those. Because
mtd->_point() provides a superset of what mtd->_get_unmapped_area() does
then there is no reason for having both. Or worse: having one but not
the other.
This is motivated by my work on XIP cramfs for both MMU and !MMU systems
where I do need the more complete point functionality. And it just looks
like the right thing to do. Existing users won't see a difference.
diffstat:
drivers/mtd/chips/map_ram.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++--------------
drivers/mtd/chips/map_rom.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
drivers/mtd/devices/mtdram.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
drivers/mtd/mtdconcat.c | 27 ---------------------------
drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c | 14 --------------
include/linux/mtd/mtd.h | 4 ----
7 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 91 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2017-10-11 3:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-11 3:26 Nicolas Pitre [this message]
2017-10-11 3:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] MTD: mtdram: properly handle the phys argument in the point method Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-11 20:47 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-10-11 21:32 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-11 21:40 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-10-11 21:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-11 3:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] MTD: chips/map_ram.c: implement point and unpoint methods Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-11 20:48 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-10-11 3:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] MTD: chips/map_rom.c: " Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-11 20:49 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-10-11 20:56 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-11 3:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] MTD: implement mtd_get_unmapped_area() using the point method Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-11 20:51 ` Richard Weinberger
2017-10-11 3:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] MTD: remove the get_unmapped_area method Nicolas Pitre
2017-10-11 21:02 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171011032621.26979-1-nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--to=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).