From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1e44gD-0004eb-Hp for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:39:40 +0000 Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 14:39:04 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Roger Quadros , Tony Lindgren Cc: linux-omap , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "Cooper Jr., Franklin" Subject: Re: gpmc-nand broken since v4.12 Message-ID: <20171016143904.098eaa50@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: References: <7eae9266-558f-6578-66d7-7ab0eb659a81@ti.com> <20171013145033.5d1d9647@bbrezillon> <20171013222458.3f4c103e@bbrezillon> <20171013222907.16adf410@bbrezillon> <20171016133457.74b2773f@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 15:12:38 +0300 Roger Quadros wrote: > =EF=BB=BFHi Boris, >=20 >=20 > Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/= Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki >=20 > On 16/10/17 14:34, Boris Brezillon wrote: > > Hi Roger, > >=20 > > On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 13:22:04 +0300 > > Roger Quadros wrote: > > =20 > >> =EF=BB=BF > >> Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunn= us/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki > >> > >> On 13/10/17 23:29, Boris Brezillon wrote: =20 > >>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 22:24:58 +0200 > >>> Boris Brezillon wrote: > >>> =20 > >>>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:50:33 +0200 > >>>> Boris Brezillon wrote: > >>>> =20 > >>>>> On Fri, 13 Oct 2017 14:57:29 +0300 > >>>>> Roger Quadros wrote: > >>>>> =20 > >>>>>> =EF=BB=BFHi Boris, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> NAND on gpmc-omap breaks for me while doing a unmount of a ubi vol= ume since v4.12 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Behaviour follows through in v4.13 and v4.14-rc as well. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Do you have any idea about this? =20 > >>>> > >>>> More info on what has changed in 4.12: we no longer allocate the > >>>> nand_buffer struct + its internal buffer using a single big kmalloc > >>>> call, which means the nand_buffer struct is now likely to be allocat= ed > >>>> in a small object slab (sizeof(nand_buffers) =3D 12). If you have a > >>>> use-after-free bug somewhere in the kernel, it might corrupt the = =20 > >> > >> Spot on. Problem starts from commit 4d5dea5725f3aa95b9b64e252540e435dd= 216dbc > >> "mtd: nand: allocate aligned buffers if NAND_OWN_BUFFERS is unset" > >> =20 > >>> > >>> I meant buffer-overflow, not use-after-free. =20 > >> > >> Your analysis seems correct. > >> =20 > >>> =20 > >>>> nand_buffers object, which might explain the bug you see here. > >>>> =20 > >>>>> > >>>>> Can you try with this patch [1] applied and paste me the values pri= nted > >>>>> just before the crash? > >>>>> > >>>>> [1]http://code.bulix.org/lc8xk0-209746 =20 > >> > >> =3D=3D unmounting volume > >> [ 36.308792] nand: nand_write_subpage_hwecc:2575 ecc_calc =3D (nul= l) oob_poi =3D ed096800 > >> [ 36.317319] mtd_ooblayout_set_bytes:1330 dst =3D ed096802 src =3D = (null) > >> [ 36.324162] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at vir= tual address 00000000 > >> > >> > >> Running the following patch > >> https://hastebin.com/ulogurutuz.php > >> shows > >> > >> [ 37.260689] nand: nand_write_subpage_hwecc:2547:A ecc_calc =3D ed11= 6e40 oob_poi =3D ed117800 > >> [ 37.260772] nand: nand_write_subpage_hwecc:2556:A1:step 0, ecc_calc= =3D ed116e40 > >> [ 37.260779] nand: nand_write_subpage_hwecc:2562:A2:step 0, ecc_calc= =3D ed116e40 > >> [ 37.260834] nand: nand_write_subpage_hwecc:2556:A1:step 1, ecc_calc= =3D ed116e40 > >> [ 37.260840] nand: nand_write_subpage_hwecc:2567:A3-pre:step 1, ecc_= calc =3D ed116e40 > >> [ 37.260846] omap_calculate_ecc_bch > >> [ 37.260856] nand: nand_write_subpage_hwecc:2570:A3-post:step 1, ecc= _calc =3D (null) > >> [ 37.260912] nand: nand_write_subpage_hwecc:2556:A1:step 2, ecc_calc= =3D (null) > >> [ 37.260918] nand: nand_write_subpage_hwecc:2562:A2:step 2, ecc_calc= =3D (null) > >> [ 37.260972] nand: nand_write_subpage_hwecc:2556:A1:step 3, ecc_calc= =3D (null) > >> [ 37.260978] nand: nand_write_subpage_hwecc:2562:A2:step 3, ecc_calc= =3D (null) > >> [ 37.260984] nand: nand_write_subpage_hwecc:2587:B ecc_calc =3D (n= ull) oob_poi =3D ed117800 > >> [ 37.260991] mtd_ooblayout_set_bytes:1330 dst =3D ed117802 src =3D = (null) > >> > >> which means omap_calculate_ecc_bch() it the culprit. > >> > >> Looks like the function calculates and stores ECC for all sectors even= if we just want ECC > >> for just one sector (sub-page). =20 > >=20 > > Yes, looks like you find the root cause. > > =20 > >> > >> Is my understanding correct > >> - We should not be hooking the multi-sector ECC calculator omap_calcul= ate_ecc_bch() to ecc.calculate > >> - provide a new one sector ECC calculator function (for BCH4/8/16) for= omap and hook it to ecc.calculate > >> OR > >> - override nand_read_subpage() and nand_write_subpage() using omap spe= cific implementation (for BCH4/8/16). =20 > >=20 > > Second solution sounds simpler because the ECC sector information is > > not passed to ecc->calculate() hook, which means you'd have to extract > > it from the ecc_calc pointer: > >=20 > > (uintptr_t)(ecc_calc - chip->buffers->ecccalc) / chip->ecc.size =20 >=20 > I don't think we need ECC sector number at all if we're always going to d= o a transfer > of one sector of data after calling ecc.hwctl(NAND_ECC_READ/WRITE) and be= fore calling ecc.calculate. >=20 > My understanding is that the ECC calculators sector 0 registers will alwa= ys contain > the right content irrespective of which sector we transfer as long as we = do, > ecc.hwctl(mtd, NAND_ECC_READ/WRITE); > transfer one sector; > ecc.calculate(); Ok, then the first solution sounds good too. >=20 > Why isn't there a nand_read_subpage_hwecc()? Probably because nobody ever needed it. Feel free to add it if you think this is necessary. > In the current form a subpage read won't work if > if ecc->mode is NAND_ECC_HW and controllers expect a ecc.hwctl(NAND_ECC_R= EAD) before > calling ecc.calculate(). >=20 > For the OMAP case I can override both subpage functions. > Is there a good way to test if subpage read/writes are working as they sh= ould? There's a nandsubpage test [1] in mtd-utils. [1]http://git.infradead.org/mtd-utils.git/blob/HEAD:/tests/mtd-tests/nandpa= getest.c