Re: [PATCH] mtd: powernv: Support MTD_NO_ERASE

Boris Brezillon
2017-10-30T08:49:04Z

On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:11:33 +1100
Stewart Smith <stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> writes:
> > I'd prefer they be documented in the kernel especially if they are
> > used by the kernel. Of course, there's IBM bindings covered by various
> > ?PAPR specs which wouldn't make sense to duplicate, but I'm guessing
> > what's documented in skiboot are not covered by those specs.
>
> Correct.
>
> I don't have an objection to docs being in both places, as long as we
> could keep both in sync. Would suitable comments in the RST doc files
> pointing to the skiboot repo as the canonical copy work?

Rob, any opinion on that?

>
> I'd like to be able to just diff a subtree of kernel and skiboot to see
> if the docs have diverged.
>
> We may also need to think of a way to ensure that any of that moving
> back/forth of edits is done in a way that makes licensing sense too
> (skiboot is Apache 2.0)
>