From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][mtd-next] mtd: nand: remove redundant check of len
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:46:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171213214628.1e1c1431@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171213213844.78efe253@bbrezillon>
On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:38:44 +0100
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:30:04 +0000
> Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> > On 13/12/17 20:24, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> > > On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 20:17:43 +0000
> > > Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> > >>
> > >> The check of len being zero is redundant as it has already been
> > >> sanity checked for this value at the start of the function. Hence
> > >> it is impossible for this test to be true and so the redundant
> > >> code can be removed.
> > >
> > > Nope, it's not the same test, the initial test is
> > >
> > > if (len && !buf)
> >
> > Ah, the current tip from linux-next has:
> >
> > 1912 if (!len || !buf)
> > 1913 return -EINVAL;
> >
> > ..so I guess that's why it got picked up by static analysis.
>
> Hm, that's weird, that's not what I see [1] in linux-next.
This being said, the test in nand_readid_op() is wrong [1], so maybe
this was the thing you were trying to fix.
No need to send a new patch, I'll squash the fix in the commit
introducing the function.
Thanks,
Boris
[1]http://code.bulix.org/kxivhd-240572
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-13 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-13 20:17 [PATCH][mtd-next] mtd: nand: remove redundant check of len Colin King
2017-12-13 20:24 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-13 20:30 ` Colin Ian King
2017-12-13 20:38 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-13 20:44 ` Colin Ian King
2017-12-13 20:47 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-13 20:46 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171213214628.1e1c1431@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@wedev4u.fr \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=marek.vasut@gmail.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox