From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Sean Nyekjaer <sean.nyekjaer@prevas.dk>
Cc: Miquel RAYNAL <miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com>,
ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
"Kasper Revsbech (KREV)" <krev@triax.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG] pxa3xx: wait time out when scanning for bb
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 23:00:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171217230032.30853780@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <461b45a8-de1f-0b54-567f-001ea30ee927@prevas.dk>
On Sun, 17 Dec 2017 22:47:26 +0100
Sean Nyekjaer <sean.nyekjaer@prevas.dk> wrote:
> Hi Boris and Miquel
> >>>
> >>>> I also tried booting with ECC enabled and with that enabled the
> >>>> driver is unable to read the bbt and marked all blocks bad.
> >>> And if I understand correctly, if you remove nand-ecc-mode = "none" (or
> >>> set it to "hw"), the kernel fails to find the BBT, that is right?
> >> Yes.
> >>> As I was not expecting such a quick answer, I did push another patch
> >>> after sending my email that fixes an issue in mtdcore.c, please check
> >>> you have it (there are a few "fixup!" patches, and on top of them you
> >>> must find one which is a well-formatted patch about
> >>> mtd_check_oob_ops()).
> >> I have rebased on top of 9aee88a618f8 mtd: Fix mtd_check_oob_ops()
> >>> I learned that today: to get a prompt while all blocks are bad, you can
> >>> add:
> >>>
> >>> chip->options |= NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN;
> >>>
> >>> Before nand_scan_tail().
> >>>
> >>> If you can reach a prompt with the failing configuration and when you
> >>> will have the time, I will welcome a dump of the same area as before
> >>> so we will try to understand what is wrong now ! :)
> >> Nice one, a lot easier to read whats happens
> >>
> >> nanddump of BBT without ECC enabled:
> >> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/627e5be058ed93c106d61641f6aa5da0
> >>
> >> nanddump of BBT with ECC enabled:
> >> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/76b3240f156c6547cf76d59f2aae49fe
> >> bootsnippet with ECC and NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN enabled.
> >> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/0d9be95cd9c36ff006f7aa03e7c2cc85
> >>
> >> Please let me know what traces you need to fix the ECC :-)
> > The dumps look good (at least, the BBT pattern is correct, we have the
> > number of ECC bytes we expect and they are where we expect them).
> >
> > My gut feeling is that something is wrong with ECC (or something related
> > to ECC) in u-boot.
> >
> > Can you try to let Linux create the BBT on its own and dump the last
> > block as you did previously?
> >
> > So, to sum-up
> >
> > 1/ put the following in your DT
> >
> > nand-ecc-mode = "hw";
> > nand-on-flash-bbt;
> >
> > 2/ scrub the NAND from u-boot and make sure you don't reboot after that,
> > so that u-boot can't recreate its own BBT.
> >
> > 3/ Let Linux boot and dump the pages (in raw mode) where BBTs created by
> > Linux are supposed to be (should be the same addresses as before)
> Trace with nand scrub in uboot and ecc enabled:
> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/3ce389b9276fddbd46f59c89b99ee4ff
>
> Same as above with "chip->options |= NAND_SKIP_BBTSCAN;" in the marvell
> nand driver
> https://gist.github.com/anonymous/3aed159b5a5ee22f27403fe79ba97400
>
> If I dump 0xFEC0000/0xFFC0000 or 0xFEE0000/0xFFE0000 (the bbt pages)
> they contain
> only 0xFF's as the kernel does not write to the blocks.
>
> To me it seem a little bit difficult to say why the new marvell nand driver
> (with ecc enabled) thinks all the freshly scrubbed blocks are bad.
Ok, now I really need the dump without the -n option. It seems that
dumping in non-raw mode does not return the expected value.
Thanks,
Boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-17 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 85+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-28 9:12 [BUG] pxa3xx: wait time out when scanning for bb Sean Nyekjær
2017-11-28 13:02 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-11-28 13:12 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-11-28 13:30 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-11-28 13:42 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-11-28 14:04 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-11-29 7:14 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-11-29 8:03 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-11-30 12:00 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-11-30 17:18 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-11-30 18:13 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-01 8:15 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-01 8:54 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-07 20:38 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-08 9:04 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-08 9:21 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-11 8:25 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-11 8:45 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-11 9:53 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-11 10:20 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-11 11:35 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-11 13:22 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-11 14:02 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-11 14:09 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-11 14:49 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-12 8:44 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-12 8:51 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-12 8:56 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-12 10:12 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-12 10:55 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-12 11:08 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-12 11:28 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-12 11:35 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-12 11:49 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-12 12:47 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-12 13:09 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-12 13:35 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-12 18:10 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-12 18:23 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-13 6:25 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-13 8:41 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-13 9:31 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-15 17:25 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-15 18:56 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-15 19:19 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-17 11:56 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2017-12-17 13:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-17 21:47 ` Sean Nyekjaer
2017-12-17 22:00 ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2017-12-17 22:15 ` [SPAM] " Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-17 22:19 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-17 22:19 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-18 6:23 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-18 8:56 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-18 9:26 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-18 9:35 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-18 10:12 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-18 10:19 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-18 10:26 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-18 10:45 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-18 10:48 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-18 12:43 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-18 8:57 ` [SPAM] " Boris Brezillon
2017-12-17 13:48 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-11 20:11 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-09 23:18 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2017-12-10 14:17 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-11 12:30 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2017-12-11 13:13 ` Miquel RAYNAL
2017-12-11 16:08 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2017-12-11 16:41 ` Miquel RAYNAL
[not found] ` <CAL92e2W7fLjVOWFgH2PpRLRP7Tf5L1vta0jduWm+bTVm647MNQ@mail.gmail.com>
2017-12-11 16:24 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2017-12-11 16:45 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-11 21:16 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-12 6:01 ` Greg Cook
2017-12-12 7:09 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2017-12-12 7:30 ` Greg Cook
2017-12-12 8:15 ` Boris Brezillon
2017-12-12 16:22 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2017-12-12 6:36 ` Sean Nyekjær
2017-12-12 6:50 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2017-12-12 7:17 ` Greg Cook
2017-12-09 23:04 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2017-12-09 23:22 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2017-12-09 23:24 ` Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171217230032.30853780@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=krev@triax.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@free-electrons.com \
--cc=sean.nyekjaer@prevas.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).